Omarosa On Trump Camp Pay Discrimination Suit: ‘A Lot Of Women’ Will Come Forward

Omarosa Manigault, director of communications for the White House Office of Public Liaison, listens to Vice President Mike Pence speak during a listening session with the historically black colleges and universities ... Omarosa Manigault, director of communications for the White House Office of Public Liaison, listens to Vice President Mike Pence speak during a listening session with the historically black colleges and universities at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex in Washington, Monday, Feb. 27, 2017. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Former White House aide Omarosa Manigault-Newman predicted on Tuesday that “a lot more” women will come forward as she and other women who worked as Trump campaign staffers sue President Donald Trump for pay discrimination.

Omarosa filed to join a lawsuit on Monday alleging that the 2016 Trump campaign had paid its female staffers 20% less than their male counterparts who were doing the same job.

During an appearance on MSNBC on Tuesday, the former reality TV star said she had been getting paid $7,000 a month while her male colleague was getting paid $11,000 to $12,000.

She also pointed at the lack of diversity within the Trump administration and the President’s moves to roll back equal pay initiatives.

“So, it’s pretty clear where the President and his administration stand on pay equality for women,” Omarosa said. “Time is up. Enough is enough.”

“I expect a lot of women will come forward once they see across the board how they were treated by this campaign,” she said later.

The lawsuit is headed by Alva Johnson, who is also suing Trump for allegedly forcibly kissing her at a rally in 2016.

Watch Omarosa below:

Read the lawsuit below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Equal pay for equal work? Isn’t everyone who works for Trump trying to do their best to grift off the government and enrich themselves. I would think women can do that just as well as men, unless Omarosa is implying that Trump let the men do that and didn’t allow the women to do it.
    eTA: rereading the article, i see this discrimination suit is for the campaign period, which means they couldn’t yet grift off of the taxpayers, so I see the suit has some possible merit, but the big picture is still that Team Trump’s expertise is not governing.

  2. Another grifter here. Thanks for the insight, Omarosa. But I don’t think I’ll hold my breath.

  3. Much as I want to root for anyone who’s got a legit beef against the Mango Mussolini, I’m finding it as hard to root for Omarosa as much as I do rooting for Typhoid Mary Mallon as a spokesperson for vaccination.

  4. What did she ever do that was worth $7K a month…

  5. Grifted while affiliated with Donnie. Grifted when she’s on the outs with Donnie. Bottom line: She’s a grifter, having learned from the master.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

7 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for dont Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for schmed Avatar for benthere Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for chlarry Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for smitty01 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for ANNFFL Avatar for faydout

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: