Federal Judge Strikes Down Wisconsin Voter ID Law

Activists sing protest songs outside the House chamber in Nashville, Tenn., Monday, April 14, 2014. The group sang, chanted and cheered about a variety of issues ranging from voter ID laws to Medicaid expansion as la... Activists sing protest songs outside the House chamber in Nashville, Tenn., Monday, April 14, 2014. The group sang, chanted and cheered about a variety of issues ranging from voter ID laws to Medicaid expansion as lawmakers conducted their business within. (AP Photo/Erik Schelzig) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

MILWAUKEE (AP) — A federal judge in Milwaukee has struck down Wisconsin’s voter Identification law, saying it unfairly burdens poor and minority voters.

U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman issued his long-awaited decision Tuesday. It invalidates Wisconsin’s law.

Wisconsin’s law would have required voters to show a state-issued photo ID at the polls. Supporters said it would cut down on voter fraud and boost public confidence in the integrity of the election process.

But Adelman sided with opponents, who said it disproportionately excluded poor and minority voters because they’re less likely to have photo IDs or the documents needed to get them.

Wisconsin’s law was only in effect for a 2012 primary before a Dane County judge declared it unconstitutional.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Even if we do get voter ID everywhere, someone has to check the IDs and verify them at the polls. What is the check against the abuse of THAT power?

  2. Avatar for eykis eykis says:

    Good News. Does this include the part so students can use Student IDs now?

  3. Let’s get rid of all of these laws enabling voter suppression!

  4. I hope this is the beginning of the end of voter suppression laws.

  5. And these efforts for voter suppression are mostly Republican actions that are calculated to reduce the number of Democratic votes by imposing restrictions that are more likely to be suffered by Democratic voters!

    Isn’t this also outrageous! And wouldn’t the Donald Sterlings on our planet have a different opinion?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

32 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for estamm Avatar for marby Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for glblank Avatar for msinformed Avatar for soeasy Avatar for populuxecowboy Avatar for labman57 Avatar for sylhines Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for ronthompson Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for gr Avatar for spiff Avatar for texasswampbuggy Avatar for eykis Avatar for robertearle Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for mld83 Avatar for magicmaker Avatar for angelo_frank Avatar for tigger2

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: