NY Farm That Refused To Host Lesbian Wedding Fined $13,000

Jennie McCarthy, left, and Melisa Erwin, right, sit in an ice cream parlor in Albany, N.Y. on Monday, Oct. 22, 2012. The couple has filed a discrimination complaint with the New York Division of Human Rights after th... Jennie McCarthy, left, and Melisa Erwin, right, sit in an ice cream parlor in Albany, N.Y. on Monday, Oct. 22, 2012. The couple has filed a discrimination complaint with the New York Division of Human Rights after they say they were turned away from a potential wedding site because they are gay. (AP Photo/Tim Roske) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — A rural New York wedding venue whose owners were fined $13,000 for refusing to host a lesbian wedding has stopped booking ceremonies.

Liberty Ridge Farm’s owners, citing constitutional rights to free speech and religious freedom, have appealed the August ruling by the Division of Human Rights that they violated state anti-discrimination law.

Their attorney said Robert and Cynthia Gifford paid the $10,000 state civil penalty and $1,500 each to Melisa and Jennie McCarthy, whose 2013 wedding they declined to host. The Giffords testified last year that in their Christian beliefs, marriage is between a man and a woman, and the ceremonies are held at their home, a private space where their own rights should be determinate.

They still book wedding receptions for anyone and are hosting the wedding ceremonies they had already booked, attorney James Trainor said Monday. Not hosting ceremonies is going to cost them business, but they decided that the ruling left them with two options — to host all or none, he said.

“To stay true to their religious beliefs, they could not accept any more ceremonies,” Trainor said. “The judge just ignored all our constitutional and religious arguments.”

The appeal filed in a state court should move shortly to the midlevel Appellate Division, where arguments are likely next year, he said.

The agency upheld the ruling of Administrative Law Judge Migdalia Pares. She concluded that the Rensselaer County farm about 25 miles north of Albany is a business open to the public, including the “mixed use” building where indoor wedding ceremonies are held and where the Giffords and their children live upstairs.

Pares wrote that the owners acknowledged having a discriminatory policy based on sexual orientation. “Complainants would not have been refused service if they were an opposite-sex couple,” she wrote.

The New York Civil Liberties Union represented the McCarthys in their civil rights complaint.

NYCLU attorney Mariko Hirose said Monday the group will represent them in the appeal also. “We certainly believe religious freedom is a fundamental part of America. That doesn’t make it OK for a business to break the law to discriminate against others.”

“This isn’t about religious freedom but discrimination,” Hirose said. “There’s a lot of case law enforcing these anti-discrimination laws.”

New York legalized same-sex marriage in June 2011. Hirose said New York amended its statute in 2002 to outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
61
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I’d suggest getting married at Hobby Lobby, catered by Chik-Fil-A, with wedding cake from Denver’s Masterpiece Cakeshop.

    In other words, rub their bigoted faces in their own ignorance and superstition.

  2. Hmmm… not getting a reading on my Sympathy Meter.

  3. They’ll make their money back and then some if they decide to sign up for the Butthurt Evangelical Martyrs Tour.

  4. This stuff is a bit more complicated that the bit suggests. First, if the real reason for denial was out of religious concerns ( true it might not have actually been that ) I think they should be able to deny service. Like it or not the Christian Bible says homosexuality is a sin. A 4000 year old opinion completely out of touch with today…yes. But no one would force a Jewish caterer to provide pork chops for a wedding and that ban is just as archaic.

    There is the chance the reason was bigotry dressed up as religious objection and if so they should go down. But how do you determine which it is? And why do gay couples make a fuss about this?

    A religious objection is a legitimate one. And I am no evangelical GOP’er. Why not just find another joint and suggest to the original one they make it clear in their advertising they do not do gay weddings due to religious beliefs? Same for bakers.

    I actually hope this is reversed and a less in your face way to resolve this mess takes place. The girls don’t deserve a fucking dime from that business and I have to ask…why would they take it? It’s a mess but capitalizing on it economically is just bullshit. A good hard look at this fubar crap leads me to believe no one…on either side of it… is on the up and up.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

55 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for jw1 Avatar for jsfox Avatar for mollynyc Avatar for trippin Avatar for hippocritic Avatar for wwss Avatar for horrido Avatar for musicman495 Avatar for jimheartney Avatar for cpinva Avatar for pseudonymousinnc Avatar for fitley Avatar for dolgre Avatar for pfusand Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for jopo Avatar for altonido Avatar for GreggH Avatar for abartel Avatar for majordog Avatar for pjbobolink Avatar for tblues11

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: