A sheriff in Arizona has reached out to other sheriffs across the country to encourage them to surveil drop box locations, a CNN investigation found.
Sheriff Mark Lamb out of Pinal County, Arizona, has been sending out emails to others in his cohort Uncle Sam-style: “Here’s how YOU can enforce election integrity,” he wrote, offering recommendations for how to increase “patrol activity around drop box locations” and use “video surveillance” with “access points directly on Sheriff Department computers.”
Lamb is the co-founder of Protect America Now, a group of about 70 sheriffs who claim to support members of law enforcement that “serve our people and protect our citizens,” according to their website. The group has been associated with the so-called constitutional sheriffs movement, an ideology based on the false belief that sheriffs have unconstrained power within their counties.
The movement centers on the belief that “ law enforcement powers held by the sheriffs supersede those of any agent, officer, elected official or employee from any level of government when in the jurisdiction of the county,” according to the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, which Lamb is also connected to.
Lamb is an eager participant in the movement, to the point that local citizens have complained he’s “selective about which laws he’s enforcing.”
His emails also encouraged other sheriffs to report suspected supposed election malfeasances to a hotline connected to the right-wing election conspiracy group True the Vote.
The conspiracy theory group founded by Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips in 2009 gained national notoriety after the 2020 election for promoting elements of Donald Trump’s Big Lie. The group, of course, backed the much-debunked propaganda film “2000 Mules”, which inspired at least two groups in Arizona to stalk drop boxes before they were stopped by a federal judge.
The emails may have had the desired effect: Sheriffs have been monitoring drop boxes since early voting began in some states. A spokesperson for the Pinal County Sheriff’s Office told CNN that deputies conduct “welfare checks” on drop boxes as part of their protocol, but CNN found no evidence of that requirement anywhere in Arizona.
Why does TPM insist on calling them by the name they give themselves, “Constitutional Sheriff’s”, instead of what they are, “Unconstitutional Sheriffs”?
I mean this from the article is really scary and is more of something you would find in totalitarian states or lawless regions without real governments:
“The group has been associated with the so-called constitutional sheriffs movement, an ideology based on the false belief that sheriffs have unconstrained power within their counties.”
Take off your forking hat when you are inside. you uncouth ass. Did not your Mama teach you no manners?
This yo-yo, Sheriff Mark Lamb out of Pinal County, Arizona is so stupid he actually believes the authority of County Mounties trumps (the perfect word here) all aspects and jurisdictions of federal law.
I kind of wish he’d test his theory by declaring “marshall law” in Pinal County, mostly so he could earn plenty of time to further hone his constitutional theories in a federal pen.
I would approve of sheriffs “monitoring” ballot drop boxes IF (it’s a big one) it was to prevent magaRepublicans from stuffing them with open bleach and/or acid containers, dog droppings, and firebombs. Preventing lefty-looking voters from voting? No. Just NO.
What is the supposed “constitutional” basis for this belief that a County Sherriff is the legal “God” of said county and subject to no authority other than, I guess, being up for election???
I don’t recall anything in the US Constitution that delegates this to individual counties. And I don’t understand how it’s only “conservatives” that get to decide their word is final in any interpretation of laws, etc. WTAF?