We May Never See All The Emails About Trump’s Bogus Voter Fraud Panel

Newly-elected Secretary of State Matt Dunlap is stands after the results were announced Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012  during a joint convention to elect constitutional officers in Augusta, Maine. (AP Photo/Joel Page)
Newly-elected Secretary of State Matt Dunlap is stands after the results were announced Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012 during a joint convention to elect constitutional officers in Augusta, Maine. (AP Photo/Joel Page)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A set of potentially juicy emails from President Trump’s disbanded voter fraud commission will likely never see the light of day, due to an appeals court decision issued Friday.

The Trump administration is not required to turn over certain emails from the defunct commission to a Democratic commissioner who sued for them, an appeals court said.

While the commissioner’s lawsuit has largely been successful in getting him access to the documents and commission work he said was withheld from him, there has continued to be a dispute over a set of those emails.

Specifically, the administration has resisted handing over to the ex-commissioner, Maine Secretary of State Matt Dunlap, emails other members of the panel sent to the administration staff organizing the panel about potential commissioners.

A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed the decision of a district judge ordering that those emails be produced.

“Private emails between Executive Branch officials and individuals who served as commissioners about potential additional commissioners are quite distinct from these examples of documents about the Commission’s ongoing, substantive work,” the appellate court said.

Dunlap sued the commission in the fall of 2017, a few months after the controversial commission was launched, alleging that he had been illegally cut out of its work.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued a preliminary injunction that December ordering the production of the records. Less than two weeks later, Trump announced he was dissolving the commission, citing specifically the burden of Dunlap’s and other lawsuits brought against the panel.

But the litigation over the withheld documents continued, even as the administration eventually turned over the bulk of the records Dunlap requested. Over the course of the case, it was revealed that the administration was withholding emails from voter fraud alarmists J. Christian Adams and Hans von Spakovsky, both members of the commission, in which, according the judge, “potential Democratic commissioners” were discussed.

A separate email, released under a Freedom of Information Act request, revealed that in early 2017, as the administration was working on the creation of the commission, von Spakovsky had reached out to allies of then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

The email raised alarm that “they are going to make this bipartisan and include Democrats. There isn’t a single Democratic official that will do anything other than obstruct any investigation of voter fraud and issue constant public announcements criticizing the commission and what it is doing, making claims that it is engaged in voter suppression.”

“Christian and I are concerned that this commission is being organized in a way that will guarantee its failure,” the email said.

Whether the other emails withheld expressed similar sentiment will remain unknown, for now. A lawyer for Dunlap did not respond to TPM’s inquiry as to whether he appeal the case to the full appeals court.

Read the appeals court opinion below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. In a free country, information about citizens is protected by law. Information about the government is open to the public.

    In a police state, information about the government is secret and he citizen’s lives are open books.

    Such total information inversion is necessary to facilitate the crimes of government and to prevent those crimes from becoming public knowledge

    As summed up by Al Gore
    "By closely guarding information about their own behavior, they are dismantling a fundamental element of our system of checks and balances. Because so long as the government’s actions are secret, they cannot be held accountable. A government for the people and by the people must be transparent to the people. "

  2. The law is there to protect the secrets of corrupt, rich, venal white men, just as the founders intended.

  3. Avatar for 2busy 2busy says:

    “they are going to make this bipartisan and include Democrats. There isn’t a single Democratic official that will do anything other than obstruct any investigation of voter fraud and issue constant public announcements criticizing the commission and what it is doing, making claims that it is engaged in voter suppression.”

    Such astute psychics don’t need no stinkin’ commission

  4. “Christian and I are concerned that this commission is being organized in a way that will guarantee its failure,”

    Funny how they turned out correct on that point…just not for the reasons they thought.

  5. I’m shocked — SHOCKED! — that the most corrupt administration in our nation’s history (in tandem with the irredeemably corrupted Guardians Of Plutocrats) would continue this cover-up.

    If this keeps up people are going to get the impression they’re a lawless crime-family, a regular mafia!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

39 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for paulw Avatar for eloise Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for 1gg Avatar for manhattan123 Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for debg Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for drriddle Avatar for lastroth Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for docd Avatar for tiowally Avatar for machoneman Avatar for tpr Avatar for iceape Avatar for pwmesq Avatar for possum Avatar for 2busy Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: