DOJ Goes All In On Trying To Block Release Of Bolton Book

on May 9, 2018 in Washington, DC.
National Security Adviser John Bolton speaks on a morning television show from the grounds of the White House, on May 9, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Justice Department just took its crusade against John Bolton’s book to 11.

On Wednesday evening, after news outlets started reporting on some of the book’s most damning revelations, the Justice Department filed in court an emergency request to block the publication of the tell-all.

The new filing came in the same civil lawsuit the Justice Department filed Tuesday aimed at recouping whatever earnings Bolton made from the book.

In an unusual move, the government is seeking an order would effectively halt third parties, such as the book stores that have already received copies of Bolton’s book, from distributing it.

The filing requested a hearing on the matter on Friday, ahead of the Tuesday publication date.

Much of the Justice Department’s filing recounted what it had previously said about Bolton allegedly breaching his NDA by moving forward with publishing his book, despite having not gotten a final approval from the prepublication review of the manuscript.

Bolton’s lawyer has suggested that the prepublication review was stalled for political reasons, citing the informal okay Bolton received from a career classification expert before a political appointee intervened in the process.

The political appointee, National Security Council Senior Director for Intelligence Programs Michael Ellis, filed a declaration in the case claiming that Bolton’s manuscript contains classified information — some portions up to “several paragraphs” in length — that, if made public, could “reasonably be expected to cause damage, serious damage, or exceptionally grave damage to the national security of the United States.”

Ellis also filed in camera, ex parte — meaning the only the court will be able to view it — a description of the examples of the classified information that could be expected to “cause damage” to U.S. national security.

“Unlike ordinary confidential information the Government holds, the information at stake here is classified, including in some instances at the Secret or Top Secret/SCI levels, which means by definition that its disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage, or exceptionally grave damage, to the national security of the United States,” the DOJ filing said.

The Justice Department also filed public declarations from other officials, including Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe backing Ellis’ assessment of the risk to national security.

The filing was a major escalation from the Justice Department. The initial lawsuit the Department filed Tuesday appeared more aimed at punishing Bolton financially than preemptively blocking the book’s release.

National security law experts told TPM that the government had a strong case for recouping Bolton’s monetary earnings, but that the bar for preventing the book’s release was much higher. There are also practical issues in trying to stop the publication of a book that has already been sent to several media outlets and presumably to third party book sellers.

Bradley Moss, a national security lawyer, predicted that, “Friday’s hearing, if it happens, will be a circus of lawyers and will be ‘must watch’ TV.”

“DOJ is going for broke with this TRO motion, trying not only to silence Bolton but also halt release of the books by the publisher and commercial resellers through an obscure federal rule that, to my knowledge, has never been used in this type of case,” he told TPM via email.

Read the DOJ filing below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Utter and complete bullshit. Both Ellis and Ratcliffe were appointed by Trump, making them complete toadies. I hope the court throws this out asap. Besides, some of the juicy bits have already been published by the Times and the Post. That horse done left the barn.

  2. Barn door, meet horse’s ass.

  3. Please arrest Bolton, that would be great. Trump would drop 10 points in the polls. Bolton could easily post bond, and charges would eventually be dropped since Trump and Barr don’t control juries.

  4. Golly, it would have been nice if Mr Walrus had testified at the impeachment hearings. FU Bolton. You are not a patriot in any sense of the word. I hope you rot in hell with Bush, Cheney, Rice and Rumsfeld.

    Edit: Thanks epicurus. And Moscow Mitch.

  5. Wouldn’t have made a damned bit of difference. #moscowmitch tipped his hand early; Trump was never going to be found guilty and removed from office. That will be up to the voters next November.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

206 more replies

Participants

Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for danny Avatar for esva Avatar for grandpajoe Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for dryheat Avatar for pshah Avatar for jinnj Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for rickjones Avatar for kelaine Avatar for maximus Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for dicktater Avatar for HBryan Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for Hektor6766

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: