DOJ Reveals Some Of Trump’s Most Over-The-Top Claims In Mar-a-Lago Case

Local law enforcement officers are seen in front of the home of former President Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida on August 9, 2022. - Former US president Donald Trump said August 8, 2022 that his Ma... Local law enforcement officers are seen in front of the home of former President Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida on August 9, 2022. - Former US president Donald Trump said August 8, 2022 that his Mar-A-Lago residence in Florida was being "raided" by FBI agents in what he called an act of "prosecutorial misconduct." (Photo by Giorgio Viera / AFP) (Photo by GIORGIO VIERA/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Trump appears set to give the special master assigned to sort through records in his case a headache, according to an early filing from the Justice Department in the matter.

Federal prosecutors on Thursday filed a letter with U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie for the Eastern District of New York outlining disputes between the government and Trump over which of an initial batch of records were off-limits to investigators for various reasons.

The DOJ said that out of 15 documents, Trump wants to say that nine are personal records under the Presidential Records Act, and that an overlapping four records are subject to executive privilege.

Trump’s assertion of executive privilege after leaving office has frustrated and confounded legal observers, who question how privilege meant to protect the executive branch can be asserted against it.

The DOJ used that argument in its letter, saying that it did not believe there was “privilege against the executive branch.” For cases where Trump claimed that records were both personal and subject to executive privilege, it questioned the logic around the apparent creation of a potentially new type of document: one both governmental and also personal to Trump.

“Plaintiff cannot logically assert Executive Privilege over two of the documents…because the parties agree that those documents are personal and not Presidential records,” prosecutors wrote. “Only official records are subject to assertions of Executive Privilege.”

It’s the latest example of a tactic that Trump has used for the six years of scandal that have accompanied him since he won the presidency: raise as many disputes as possible, legitimate or not, to muddy the waters and slow things down.

At a hearing on Tuesday, Dearie, the special master whose appointment Trump supported, emphasized to the two parties that they needed to support their privilege claims with evidence, and suggested that he would be skeptical towards executive privilege claims over personal records.

But the letter, though only covering a small batch of non-classified records seized from Mar-a-Lago in August, suggests that Trump may intend to raise extensive disputes before the special master over the coming months.

The DOJ said that six of the records that Trump wants to claim are personal have to do with Trump’s pardon authority as president, while two of them have to do with immigration policy. Another has to do with an email exchange involving the Air Force Academy’s baseball coach.

Trump claimed, per the DOJ, that two records — one referring to “meeting requests” and another referring to “questions for POTUS approval” — are covered by executive privilege and constitute personal records.

Per the DOJ letter, Trump claims that some of the documents capture communications between himself and his advisers, thereby making them qualify for protection under executive privilege.

The privilege was first created to protect deliberations between a president and his advisers. The DOJ pointed out in its letter that Trump is no longer President.

“Even if Plaintiff were permitted to assert executive privilege against the Executive
Branch, that assertion would fail here because the government has a ‘demonstrated, specific need’ for this evidence in its ongoing criminal investigation,” prosecutors wrote.

Latest News
95
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. As I said the day of the FBI “raid” that the claims of documents being covered by Executive Privilege and therefore should not have been seized by the Feds is absurd. If a document is covered by EP it is, by definition, a Presidential record and therefore stolen by Trump when he took it to FL after he left office instead of turning it over to NARA which he is required to by law.

  2. “The DOJ pointed out in its letter that Trump is no longer President.” Maybe I’m not following closely enough, but I can’t see why this is still a legal or quasi-legal thing. Why is Judge Dearie “skeptical” about Trump claiming executive privilege? Why isn’t he saying, “1) you’re no longer President, and 2) the current executive wants these, so your claim of executive privilege is a non sequitur and a non-starter”? Is it because Cannon has muddied the legal waters so badly?

  3. Hi! To find out what I can do, say @discobot display help.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

89 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for ajm Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for fgs Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for lastroth Avatar for ifeveroheverawiztherewas Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for darrtown Avatar for known_thespian Avatar for birdford Avatar for tiowally Avatar for tmulcaire Avatar for brian512 Avatar for socalista Avatar for jwbuho Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for easternash

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: