Justice Dept. Issues Notice Of Proposed Regulation To Ban Bump Stocks

OREM, UT - FEBRUARY 21: A bump stock is installed on an AK-47 at Good Guys Gun and Range on February 21, 2018 in Orem, Utah. The bump stock is a device when installed allows a semi-automatic to fire at a rapid rate m... OREM, UT - FEBRUARY 21: A bump stock is installed on an AK-47 at Good Guys Gun and Range on February 21, 2018 in Orem, Utah. The bump stock is a device when installed allows a semi-automatic to fire at a rapid rate much like a fully automatic gun. (Photo by George Frey/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration said Saturday it has taken the first step in the regulatory process to ban bump stocks, likely setting the stage for long legal battles with gun manufacturers while the trigger devices remain on the market.

The move was expected after President Donald Trump ordered the Justice Department to work toward a ban following the shooting deaths of 17 people at a Florida high school in February. Bump stocks, which enable guns to fire like automatic weapons, were not used in that attack — they were used in last year’s Las Vegas massacre — but have since become a focal point in the gun control debate.

The Justice Department’s regulation would classify the hardware as a machine gun banned under federal law. That would reverse a 2010 decision by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives that found bump stocks did not amount to machine guns and could not be regulated unless Congress amended existing firearms law or passed a new one.

A reversal of the department’s earlier evaluation could be seen as an admission that it was legally flawed, which manufacturers could seize on in court. Even as the Trump administration moves toward banning the devices, some ATF officials believe it lacks the authority to do so.

But any congressional effort to create new gun control laws would need support from the pro-gun Republican majority. A bid to ban the accessory fizzled last year, even as lawmakers expressed openness to the idea after nearly 60 people were gunned down in Las Vegas.

Calls mounted for a bump stock ban after that massacre, and the Justice Department said it would again review whether they can be prohibited under federal law. Trump told officials to expedite the review, which yielded more than 100,000 comments from the public and the firearms industry. Many of the comments came from gun owners angry over any attempt to regulate the accessory, a move they view as a slippery slope toward outlawing guns altogether.

The proposal still needs the approval of the Office of Management and Budget.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Release the NRA slush fund, lot’s of pliable Repugs politicians out there out there…

  2. Avatar for tao tao says:

    Making existing bump stocks much more valuable is an unintended consequence of this proposal. Look for a manufacturing surge and higher retail prices from now until the law goes into effect. Just like high capacity magazines during the assault weapon ban some years ago. In a more perfect NRA world everyone would carry an Uzi machine pistol. This rule will never become law unless politicians are willing to go against a kicking and screaming NRA gun lobby.

  3. Note that they are doing nothing about the much deadlier Gat-cranks.

  4. Whether this can be accomplished by regulations, or requires a statute, is an open question. Still, it’s worth trying the regulatory route because Congress may not have the cojones to do it. Let the courts deal with it.

  5. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    Countdown to litigation in 3, 2, 1…

    And the previous set of lawyers likely did a thorough job of research and reasoning for why they couldn’t regulate, as opposed to the rushed version here.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for george_c Avatar for paulw Avatar for tctundra Avatar for tao Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for tiowally Avatar for maximus Avatar for adifferentdonald

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: