DOJ Assures Skeptical Judge It Didn’t Do Roger Stone Any Favors To Delay Prison

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 20: Roger Stone, former adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump, arrives at E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse on February 20, 2020 in Washington, DC. Stone will be sentenced Thursday morning on his convictions for witness tampering and lying to Congress. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 20: Roger Stone, former adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump, arrives at E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse on February 20, 2020 in Washington, DC. Stone is due to be sentenced ... WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 20: Roger Stone, former adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump, arrives at E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse on February 20, 2020 in Washington, DC. Stone is due to be sentenced today after he was found guilty on seven felony counts of obstructing a congressional investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Federal prosecutors told the judge in Roger Stone’s case that the “only reason” that they are going along with Stone’s request to delay his surrender date is that doing so is in line with a broad policy from the Justice Department for the COVID-19 pandemic.

A late Thursday night filing from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in D.C., plus a separate filing Friday from the Stone’s attorneys, gives a fuller picture of Stone’s efforts to put off going to prison for his 40-month sentence.

“To conform with our policy and practice—and for no other reason—the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia does not oppose a 60-day extension of the defendant’s self surrender date,” the DOJ filing said.

The prosecutors said that the Bureau of Prisons had made the move to initially delay Stone’s surrender date until June 30 due to the pandemic, while suggesting that they were not at all involved in those discussions.

On Friday, Stone told the judge that when he asked BOP on June 1 to delay the surrender date again, he did not receive a BOP response beyond an automated acknowledgement of the request. Later, on June 10, Stone’s lawyers were informed by “government counsel” that BOP was no longer granting such requests. But further discussions with the “parties” involved resulted in him filing the request with her.

The prosecutors said Thursday they’re not opposing the request because of a directive from the Executive Office of United States Attorneys that due to the pandemic, only in certain circumstance should the DOJ oppose defendants’ requests to delay surrender dates.

Stone’s case does not present those circumstances, the prosecutors said Friday. Specifically, Stone does not pose a flight risk nor is he a danger to the community — a claim the DOJ rested on findings the judge made herself when allowing Stone to voluntarily surrender.

“[T]his Office possesses no actionable information of a change in circumstances to press against that determination, faithful adherence to EOUSA’s directive dictates that we not oppose a 60-day extension,” the DOJ said.

The prosecutors said that how they’re treating Stone’s request is in line with how the executive office’s directive has been applied across the country. There “is no instance in which this Office has opposed a request to extend a self-surrender date during the pandemic,” they said, pointing to three other recent cases where they went along with similar delay requests.

That U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson is making all the parties explain all these behind-the-scenes machinations suggests that she is reluctant to take Justice Department at its word. She ordered the explanations after Stone claimed earlier this week that the Department was not opposed to his delay request.

Jackson sentenced Stone in February to 40 months in prison after a jury convicted him of false statements, witness tampering and obstruction of Congress’ Russia probe.

The department previously watered down its sentencing recommendation for Stone, in a series of moves that the judge called “unprecedented.”

Just before Stone on Tuesday filed his request to delay his surrender date, written congressional testimony from a prosecutor who had worked on his case was made public. In the testimony, the prosecutor, Aaron Zelinsky, alleged that political considerations motivated the department to change the sentencing memo, which prompted him and three other career prosecutors to resign from the case.

It’s unclear if the allegations played a role in the judge then ordering the DOJ to put “in writing” its reasons for its position in the surrender date matter.

Stone’s court filings Tuesday also seemed to contradict what he said in an Instagram over the weekend, in which he claimed that the government rejected his delay request and that is why he was now turning to the court. On Friday, Stone explained that government had informed his lawyers on June 10 that BOP “was no longer extending surrender dates based on COVID-19.”

“BOP would not be changing Stone’s June 30, 2020 surrender date. 10. BOP’s determination led to discussions between the parties that ultimately resulted in Stone’s decision to file his Unopposed Motion to Extend Surrender Date,” Stone said.

Read the filings below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. They need to give him an ankle bracelet and set the range to a single room.

  2. So, the COVID virus isn’t a hoax??

  3. No favors, eh?

    Riiiiiiight…

    (Wink, wink, nod, nod…)

  4. Stone’s BBF Trump is hell bent on re-opening the country for business despite rising Covid-19 infections!

    Thus, Stone should be in jail now because if the country is reopening for business, then the business of justice should also be on going!

    ICYMI:

    Buzzfeed had to FOIA to get some unredacted portions of the Mueller Report to discover that Stone had Informed Trump

    …in advance that WikiLeaks would be releasing documents embarrassing to the Clinton campaign and subsequently informed advisers that he expected more releases would be coming,

    Coordination galore and COLLUSION after all those chants of “No collusion” a lifetime ago!

  5. I’m OK with this, as long as Stone is confined to a limited area, i.e. chained to a large anvil in a small closed room filled with starving rats.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

32 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for fess Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for fgs Avatar for nellieh Avatar for becca656 Avatar for dont Avatar for drriddle Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for hagarwood Avatar for musgrove Avatar for kitty Avatar for riverstreet Avatar for mtblaze Avatar for decay500 Avatar for d2square Avatar for edhedh Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for greysea Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for juvenal Avatar for joejim Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: