DOJ Admits Barr’s Purported Example Of Mass Mail-In Voter Fraud Was Inaccurate

Attorney General William Barr listens during an event to highlight the Department of Justice grants to combat human trafficking, in the Indian Treaty Room of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on August 4, 2020... Attorney General William Barr listens during an event to highlight the Department of Justice grants to combat human trafficking, in the Indian Treaty Room of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on August 4, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Department of Justice admitted on Thursday that Attorney General Bill Barr’s description of a case that he claimed to be proof of mass election fraud via mail-in ballots was incorrect.

“Prior to his interview, the Attorney General was provided a memo prepared within the Department that contained an inaccurate summary about the case which he relied upon when using the case as an example,” DOJ spokesperson Kerri Kupec told the Washington Post.

During an interview with CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer on Wednesday, Barr defended his and President Donald Trump’s false claim that voting by mail leads to widespread election fraud by citing a case in Texas led by the Dallas County district attorney in 2017.

“For example, we indicted someone in Texas. 1,700 ballots collected from people who could vote, he made them out and voted for the person he wanted to,” the Trump official told Blitzer.

But Andy Chatham, the assistant district attorney who worked on the case told the Post “that’s not what happened at all.”

“We didn’t find any evidence of widespread voter fraud, and instead the ballots that were returned were consistent with the voter’s choice,” Chatham said.

Another top prosecutor in the case, Mike Snipes, told the Post that the office had believed there were “potentially 1,700 fraudulent ballots” at first, “but we did not uncover that, at all.”

Chatham slammed Barr over his claims about the case.

“Unfortunately, it speaks volumes to the credibility of Attorney General Barr when he submits half-truths and alternative facts as clear evidence of voter fraud without having so much as even contacted me or the district attorney’s office for an understanding of the events that actually occurred,” Chatham told the Post.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for denisj denisj says:

    This is not surprising, when has Barr’s behavior not been questionable? His slavish behavior to Trump is unfaltering.

  2. Avatar for docd docd says:

    A DOJ spokesperson replied “Well, he’s a liar and a fraud, and if he ever had any loyalty to the law he has abandoned that altogether, but he’s ours until we can get that treasonous f–k D----d T----p out of office.”

  3. The chief law enforcement officer for the country lied?

    Shocking…

  4. Barr’s Purported Example Of Mass Mail-In Voter Fraud Was Inaccurate

    more accurately,
    Barr is just a scumbag who will lie automatically at the liar in chiefs request.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

62 more replies

Participants

Avatar for george_c Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for sysprog Avatar for trnc Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for joelopines Avatar for lastroth Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for slaughter Avatar for schmed Avatar for benthere Avatar for jinnj Avatar for edgarant Avatar for redemptionsong Avatar for tmulcaire Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for agnesbee Avatar for iamsmall Avatar for godwit Avatar for mattfrommich Avatar for majesticunicorn Avatar for kovie Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: