DOJ Willing To Accept Trump’s Proposed Candidate For Special Master

WELLINGTON, OHIO - JUNE 26: Former US President Donald Trump speaks to supporters during a rally at the Lorain County Fairgrounds on June 26, 2021 in Wellington, Ohio. Trump is in Ohio to campaign for his former Whit... WELLINGTON, OHIO - JUNE 26: Former US President Donald Trump speaks to supporters during a rally at the Lorain County Fairgrounds on June 26, 2021 in Wellington, Ohio. Trump is in Ohio to campaign for his former White House advisor Max Miller. Miller is challenging incumbent Rep. Anthony Gonzales in the 16th congressional district GOP primary. This is Trump's first rally since leaving office. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Justice Department signaled on Monday that it would accept one of ex-President Donald Trump’s picks for a special master who would review materials the FBI seized in its Mar-a-Lago raid last month.

In a four-page filing submitted to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, federal prosecutors proposed three candidates, one of which included Raymond J. Dearie, a former chief federal judge in New York who was appointed by Ronald Reagan.

The other two candidates were the retired federal judges the DOJ had previously proposed: Barbara Jones and Thomas Griffith. The Trump legal team had urged Cannon to reject both of them.

Dearie, Jones and Griffith have “substantial judicial experience, during which they have presided over federal criminal and civil cases, including federal cases involving national security and privilege concerns,” the DOJ wrote in its latest filing.

However, the government noted that Dearie isn’t retired, but rather at “senior status.”

“If this Court were to select Judge Dearie as the special master, the government would defer to the Court and Judge Dearie to determine whether the special master role would constitute outside employment and what rules and/or restrictions, if any, would apply to his serving in this capacity,” the prosecutors wrote.

Cannon — whose decision to approve Trump’s request for a special master and disrupt the DOJ’s investigation into the documents that were stashed at Mar-a-Lago, sending shockwaves through the legal community — will ultimately decide who will be appointed.

Read the filing below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. This whole exercise is like trying to have a conversation with someone’s three-year-old. The DOJ knows this is the wrong venue, that different kinds of privilege are being confused, that they have already done the sifting a special master would do, and that Biden’s waiving of executive privilege moots most of Trump’s claims – and yet here they are, forced to speak slowly and deliberately, because they are dealing with toddlers.

  2. The DOJ is giving a mile when an inch would do. But, it makes the screams of tdfg “I’m Innocent! How Dare They” even more delightful when he’s indicted

  3. Indictments can’t come soon enough. Unfortunately, I don’t think Garland will go for it prior to the midterms.

    Justice delayed is starting to look like justice partially denied. I do believe that indictments ARE coming, but for god’s sake, let’s get this party started.

  4. I am convinced that Garland is on the right track. People castigate and scorn him…call him names.

    But we must remember that he has at least the same motivation that we do…maybe more.

    (1) If he fails, we all will be much more in danger from authoritarian Republicans…MAGA and otherwise

    (2) Whether or not Garland "behaves to Trump’s liking, that vengeful man will exact the same revenge.

  5. Avatar for noonm noonm says:

    However, the government noted that Dearie isn’t retired, but rather at “senior status.”

    “If this Court were to select Judge Dearie as the special master, the government would defer to the Court and Judge Dearie to determine whether the special master role would constitute outside employment and what rules and/or restrictions, if any, would apply to his serving in this capacity,” the prosecutors wrote.

    I wonder if this is the DOJs subtle way of saying ‘he’d be acceptable, but only if he’s retired’. Could be a way to get another Judicial appointment for Biden on the court.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

95 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for joelopines Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for nocoolnamejim Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for ted Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for lcbo Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for noonm Avatar for grack Avatar for kelaine Avatar for read2much Avatar for enn Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for RedGargantua

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: