Dems Respond To Trump’s ‘Baseless Objections’ In New Legal Brief

WASHINGTON, DC Ð JANUARY 16:  House impeachment managers Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Rep. Val Demings (D-FL), Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), Rep. Sylvia Garcia (D-TX) walk to the Senate chamber for impeachment proceedings at the U.S. Capitol on January 16, 2020 in Washington, DC. On Thursday, the House impeachment managers will read the articles of impeachment against President Trump in the Senate chamber and the chief justice of the Supreme Court and every senator will be sworn in. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 16: House impeachment managers Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Rep. Val Demings (D-FL), Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), Rep. ... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 16: House impeachment managers Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Rep. Val Demings (D-FL), Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), Rep. Sylvia Garcia (D-TX) walk to the Senate chamber for impeachment proceedings at the U.S. Capitol on January 16, 2020 in Washington, DC. On Thursday, the House impeachment managers will read the articles of impeachment against President Trump in the Senate chamber and the chief justice of the Supreme Court and every senator will be sworn in. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Democrats responded to arguments from President Donald Trump’s legal team in a new brief Tuesday.

The seven House impeachment managers who’ll present the lower chamber’s argument in the Senate described the President’s team’s briefing as raising “baseless objections.” They also said Trump didn’t appear eager to defend his actions.

“It is clear from his response that President Trump would rather discuss anything other than what he actually did,” the brief read.

Trump’s legal team, led by White House Counsel Pat Cipollone and Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow, opened a lengthy brief on impeachment Monday by asserting that “abuse of power,” the first charge levied against Trump, was “a made-up theory that would permanently weaken the Presidency.”

But Democrats pointed out that even the Republicans’ legal analyst of choice, Jonathan Turley, disagreed. In congressional testimony, Turley argued that the “other high crimes and misdemeanors” listed in the Constitution apply to impeachable acts “even if they are not technically criminal acts.”

The Democrats’ brief took further issue with Trump’s team’s claim that barring witnesses from testifying was a “legitimate prerogative” of the Executive Branch.

“His across-the-board refusal to provide Congress with information and his assertion that his own lawyers are the sole judges of Presidential privilege undermines the constitutional authority of the people’s representatives and shifts power to an imperial president,” they wrote.

Much of the brief was similar to House impeachment managers’ earlier brief, filed Saturday.

But with the impeachment kicking off in earnest Tuesday, the new document carried a little more punch than the legal salvos launched over the weekend.

“Indeed, on the eve of his impeachment trial, President Trump continues to insist that he has done nothing wrong,” the brief read. “President Trump’s view that he cannot be held accountable, except in an election he seeks to fix in his favor, underscores the need for the Senate to exercise its solemn constitutional duty to remove President Trump from office.”

Read Democrats’ brief below:

Latest News
75
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. An hour in and already a GOP shitshow.

  2. They need to get on with putting all Senators on record as to witnesses and other evidence. They should invoke Watergate. The Supreme Court ruled that the tapes had to be released. This is no different!

  3. Way OT, but Public Health Seattle daughter informs me that the Chinese Wuhan coronavirus is now in WA. And us without a fully functional CDC. This is going to be a very difficult control scenario.

  4. It’s easy to be perfunctory and concise when you don’t have a bona fide defense to articulate; when you have nothing substantial to say.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

69 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for sooner Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for tiowally Avatar for uneducated Avatar for tpr Avatar for j_publicus Avatar for maximus Avatar for euglena4056 Avatar for dougsanders Avatar for jackofalltirades Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for mtw Avatar for rucleare Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for faydout

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: