Cruz: I Voted No on Lynch By Not Showing Up to Vote

UNITED STATES - JANUARY 27: Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, speaks with reporters following the Senate Republicans' policy lunch on Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2015. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, a declared presidential candidate, has a new defense for missing Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s confirmation vote last week. According to Cruz, not voting was the same as voting “no.”

“I voted twice against Loretta Lynch being confirmed. There was no significance to the final vote. And I had a scheduling conflict. Under the Senate rules, absence is the equivalent of a ‘no’ vote. It is identical procedurally,”Cruz told reporters on Capitol Hill Thursday.

In fact, missing a confirmation vote isn’t the same as voting “no,” and could affect the outcome. And Senate rules don’t say otherwise.

Cruz’s office has insisted all along that the procedural “cloture” vote on Lynch’s nomination last week was the one that mattered, and Cruz opposed that. He then became the only senator to miss the final vote, despite having delivered a floor speech earlier in the day railing against Lynch.

His office didn’t explain why he missed the final vote, although Cruz was expected that evening at a fundraiser in Texas.

Cruz repeated the cloture explanation to reporters, telling them: “Cloture was the vote that mattered. It required 60 votes.”

In fact cloture on Lynch took only a simple majority under a rules change on nominations pushed through by Democrats. “Fair point. Sorry I actually thought of the rules as they were written,” Cruz said when reporters corrected him on that point.

Lynch was confirmed April 23 on a vote of 56-43, with Cruz recorded as “not voting.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for eda eda says:

    I agree with everyone else who feels that this piece of Canadian brownback is no longer worthy of being commented on.

  2. Canacuban is good but I prefer Cubanadian.

  3. OMG that face is so punchable! Just look at the smarminess oozing out of every pore of his body. He’s like the “evil politician” character straight out of Central Casting.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

68 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for ichthus Avatar for jonathang Avatar for wiz99 Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for mooster Avatar for deckbose Avatar for kufpu Avatar for datora Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for joelopines Avatar for tecmage Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for kitty Avatar for twowolves Avatar for bigdaddydrj Avatar for azjude Avatar for darrtown Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for aprogressiveoldlady

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: