Cruz: ‘Entire Reason’ For Quick Confirmation Is So Barrett Can Weigh In On Election Issues

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 29: Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) takes questions from reporters in the Senate subway during a recess in the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump in the on January 29, 2020 in Washington, DC. The trial entered the phase today where senators will have the opportunity to submit written questions to the House managers and President Trump's defense team. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Ted Cruz
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) takes questions from reporters during a recess in the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on January 29, 2020. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) said Tuesday that a potential dispute of election results is why the Senate should move quickly to confirm Trump nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Amy Coney Barrett.

“The entire reason the Senate should act and should act promptly to confirm a ninth justice is so that the Supreme Court can resolve any cases that arise in the wake of the election,” Cruz told reporters.

Earlier on Tuesday, Cruz told NPR that a Supreme Court as it stands with a seat left vacant by the recent death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg “lacks the constitutional authority to decide anything,” Cruz said. “And so we could have multiple conflicting opinions from multiple courts of appeals and weeks or months of chaos and uncertainty.”

Cruz told NPR’s Steve Inskeep that he thinks Barrett — the ideological heir of the late Justice Antonin Scalia and former Trump pick who was confirmed to the U.S. District’s 7th Circuit — would be a “strong justice.” 

The comments come after some Democrats, including Sen. Cory Booker (NJ) have said that while they were open to meeting with Barrett as she met with GOP senators during an appearance on Capitol Hill on Tuesday that it was important from Barrett to recuse herself from rendering any judgment related to upcoming election results.

“If she does not recuse herself, I fear that the court will be further delegitimized,” Booker, who is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee told NBC News’ “Meet the Press” on Sunday.

Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) made a likeminded suggestion before Trump had formally announced Barrett, similarly telling NPR Thursday that given the “arguable ethical complication” of a justice confirmed so close to the election, Trump’s nominee “should recuse herself” from weighing in on election issues.

The concerns raised by Democratic leaders follow President Trump’s remarks last week during a White House briefing, telling reporters when asked, that he may not be committed to a peaceful transfer of power if he faces electoral defeat in November.

“I think this [the election] will end up in the Supreme Court, and I think it’s very important that we have nine justices,” Trump said on Wednesday.

The President appeared to double down on that message during a campaign rally Friday. He told crowds in Newport News, Virginia, that while he wanted “a smooth, beautiful transition,” he would only relent if the results were borne of a “honest vote,” adding amid an ongoing effort to delegitimize mail-in voting that the election which is just weeks away is a “disaster waiting to happen.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a tweet Tuesday that he would decline a meeting with Barrett amid what he called an “illegitimate process.”

He said that the effort by Republicans to jam through a confirmation put at risk the health care of roughly 23 million Americans who are insured under provisions of the Affordable Care Act– an Obama-era policy that faces its latest challenge before the high court in November — just a week after the presidential election and shortly after Barrett is confirmed if all goes as planned.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. One key trait of the GOP: Failure to keep the quiet part quiet.

    Coney-Barrett should recuse herself from election cases, but we know she won’t.

  2. So being concerned about an 8 member SC during an election year never once crossed the minds of Republicans during 2016, and Garland left hanging in the wind? Why wouldn’t MoscowMitch have mentioned this sooner, or Cruz who was a fucking primary candidate?

  3. Avatar for jtx jtx says:

    Straight from the horses mouth.

  4. Avatar for jte jte says:

    Krikey! They’re not even pretending to try and not say the quiet parts out loud. Can you imagine the amount of shit that would hit the fan if a Democratic senator basically said this? “We need to ram through this appointment so that a liberal SCOTUS can rubber-stamp whatever election skullduggery we engage in?”

    The mind reels. Also, I hear Biden and the Dems are lawyering the fuck up to fight what will no doubt be a blizzard lawsuits from Trump over every single damn thing that will make Bush v. Gore look like a People’s Court case over a scratched car door. They’d better be.

  5. It’s not even saying the quiet part out loud. It’s the official out loud part.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

109 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for pyanfar Avatar for cervantes Avatar for irasdad Avatar for sniffit Avatar for psudawnc Avatar for danny Avatar for lastroth Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for benthere Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for jtx Avatar for Ken_a_roni Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for tiowally Avatar for brian512 Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for lanabill Avatar for bcgister Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for dogselfie Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: