Court: Dept. Of Education Violated Privacy Law For Defrauded Students

on May 22, 2018 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies during a House House Education and the Workforce Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, May 22, 2018 in Washington, DC. The hearing focus is on examining... WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies during a House House Education and the Workforce Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, May 22, 2018 in Washington, DC. The hearing focus is on examining the policies and priorities of the U.S. Department of Education. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal court has ruled that the Education Department violated privacy laws with regard to students defrauded by the Corinthian for-profit college chain.

In a break with Obama administration policy, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos announced in December that some students cheated by the now-defunct schools would only get a part of their federal student loan forgiven. In order to determine how much to forgive, the agency analyzes average earnings of graduates from similar programs.

But a California district court ruled late Friday that the department’s use of Social Security Administration data in order to calculate loan forgiveness violates the Privacy Act. The court ordered that the Education Department stop the practice and stop debt collection from these students.

The court also said that it needs to hear more from the agency and plaintiffs in the class-action suit in order to decide whether or not to compel the agency to return to full loan forgiveness. A hearing is scheduled for June 4.

The decision marks an important victory for students challenging the partial loan forgiveness rule.

Toby Merill, director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending at Harvard University, which is representing the students, hailed the decision.

“The notion that students got anything other than negative value from Corinthian has been roundly disproved by student experience and the judgment of employers and the legitimate higher education sector,” Merill said in a statement. ”

An Education Department spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment Saturday.

DeVos said the approach of the Obama administration left room for potential abuse and unfairly burdened taxpayers who ended up paying for those loans with their taxes. DeVos said her new procedure will take into account the value a student received from their education and compensate them for what they didn’t get.

But critics slammed the new rule as unfair since tens of thousands of Corinthian students have already received full loan discharge under the Obama administration. They said some students will not be able to get a full refund just by virtue of working a minimum-wage job in an unrelated field and making some income.

One of the plaintiffs in the suit, Jennifer Craig, borrowed $9,000 to attend a Corinthian medical insurance and billing program in 2014, but she never received her diploma because the school shut down in 2015. She was unable to get a job in her area of study because the school did not provide her with the necessary practical training. The Education Department only forgave 20 percent of her loan. Craig says that she and her husband live in poverty and are unable to pay off the remaining 80 percent.

The Obama administration cracked down hard on for-profit colleges accused of fraud and shut down Corinthian and other major chains and tightened regulations for the schools. The administration spent $550 million to fully forgive the loans of tens of thousands of students.

There are currently nearly 100,000 claims from students still pending at the department.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. “Well how can my friends with for profit schools make any money if we have to hold them accountable?” DeVos

    “Why are we paying for crappy degrees?” Taxpayers

  2. So here’s the DeVos method, as I understand it: You borrow the money from the US govt to buy a car from Volkswagen. It turns out to be a lemon. In fact, every Volkswagon produced turns out to be a complete lemon and the company goes out of business. The feds decide that they are going to forgive the car loans. So they look at how much mileage other car owners have gotten on their Toyotas and Hondas and Hyundais, figure out the “value” of that, and deduct it from how much of your loan you are forgiven.

    Make sense? I think not.

  3. The Obama administration cracked down hard on for-profit
    colleges accused of fraud and shut down Corinthian and other major
    chains and tightened regulations for the schools.

    There are two reasons why DeVos tried to reverse the rule. First, it was an Obama rule, and therefore “bad.” Second, the person in the Oval Office is on the other side of the issue. He tried to make money off of the fraudulent school known as Trump University.

  4. DeVos said the approach of the Obama administration left room for potential abuse and unfairly burdened taxpayers who ended up paying for those loans with their taxes.

    Contra, the approach of the Trump administration leaves room for substantial abuse and properly burdens the defrauded students who end up paying for those loans with their nonexistent income increases from their nonexistent education. It’s a return to the rule of caveat emptor and unregulated free market consumer fraud. There’s a sucker born every minute and it’s the duty of the entrepreneurial class to capitalize on their gullibility.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

19 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for cassandram Avatar for jcs Avatar for scottnatlanta Avatar for epicurus Avatar for opinionated1 Avatar for maxwellsdemon Avatar for lastroth Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for benthere Avatar for pshah Avatar for caltg Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for birdford Avatar for mkposs Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for drtv Avatar for enhancedthespian Avatar for drdementa Avatar for rascal_crone

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: