Court Denies Request To Delay Obama For-Profit Fraud Protection

on June 5, 2018 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 05: Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill, June 5, 2018 in Washington, DC. The subcommittee heard testimony on the adminis... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 05: Education Secretary Betsy DeVos testifies during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill, June 5, 2018 in Washington, DC. The subcommittee heard testimony on the administrations FY2019 budget request for the Education Department. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — Students defrauded by for-profit colleges scored an important victory on Tuesday, when a court cleared the way for an Obama-era policy that will make it easier for them to get their student loans forgiven.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos had said the regulation, known as borrower defense, made discharging loans too easy and was unfair to taxpayers. The rule was due to take effect in July 2017, but DeVos froze it while she worked on devising a new regulation.

But U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss ruled last month that DeVos’ delay was unlawful. On Tuesday, he denied a request by an organization representing for-profit colleges in California, to further postpone the rule, thus paving the way for borrower defense to enter into force.

“The rule is finally in effect. No more excuses. No more delays,” said Julie Murray, an attorney with Public Citizen, who is representing the defrauded students in their suit against DeVos.

Education Department spokeswoman Liz Hill said DeVos “respects the role of the court and accepts the court’s decision” and will soon provide information about how the regulation will be implemented.

But DeVos continues to regard the regulation as “bad policy” and will continue writing a new rule “that protects both borrowers and taxpayers,” Hill said in a statement Tuesday.

The ruling marks a significant setback for DeVos, who has made deregulating the for-profit college industry a top priority. The decision means that the Obama rule, which DeVos has fought hard to scrap, could be in effect until July 2020, when any new rule written by DeVos would enter into force.

Under the Obama rule, students whose school closed mid-program or shortly after completion, will become eligible for automatic loan discharge. The Century Foundation, a progressive think tank, estimates that Tuesday’s decision will affect tens of thousands of students at over 1,400 schools who will now be eligible for $400 million in automatic debt relief across the nation.

Other provisions in the rule allow students to apply for loan discharge as a group. It also prevents schools from forcing students to sign away their rights to sue the program and makes sure that the schools, not just tax payers, bear financial responsibility in case the schools end up shutting down.

Over 100,000 students who say they have been swindled by their schools are currently waiting for the Education Department to consider their applications for loan forgiveness. James Kvaal, president of the Institute for College Access and Success, said that the agency must immediately halt debt collections and wipe out the loans of those borrowers whose schools have been shut down.

“This is a major victory for students across this country in the ongoing battle against the Department of Education and the for-profit college industry,” said Toby Merrill, director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending at Harvard University that also took part in the lawsuit.

But Steve Gunderson, president of Career Education Colleges and Universities, the industry lobbying group, described Judge Moss’ ruling as “disappointing as it will only create further confusion for students and schools” and urged the Education Department to provide as much as guidance as possible while it finishes writing the new rule.

Gunderson added, “Many will look at this ruling where a Judge appointed by President Obama upholds a rule created by the Obama Department of Education and see further evidence of the politicization of our court system.”

The group, whose motion to delay the rule was denied Tuesday, the California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools, did not return a request for comment.

Latest News
6
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Totally unfit for her position and totally partisan.

    She claims she’s worried about the “taxpayers.”

    Hilarious. What a greedy, stupid woman. That she’s the Education Secretary is just another Trump travesty and a slap in the face to all those public school teachers who educate, mentor and stand in for parents, rich and poor.

  2. But [for-profit college lobbyist] Steve Gunderson … described Judge Moss’ ruling as “disappointing as it will only create further confusion for students and schools”

    Right. They’ll be confused about what to do with the extra money in their pockets. SAD!

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    Education Department spokeswoman Liz Hill said DeVos “respects the role
    of the court and accepts the court’s decision” and will soon provide
    information about how the regulation will be implemented.

    In other words, they are going to ignore the court’s decision until there’s yet another lawsuit to hold them in contempt.

  4. Avatar for eda eda says:

    My “like” is for the comment, definitely not for the probable position of the American oligarchs’ Dept. of Education.

  5. Gunderson added, “Many will look at this ruling where a Judge appointed by President Obama upholds a rule created by the Obama Department of Education and see further evidence of the politicization of our court system.”

    Drop dead, you fucking fraud. Your lobbying group represents some of the most vile parasites of society. People, mostly young, who are trying to improve their lives by getting the education that could move them out of dead-end, minimum-wage jobs are your prey. Your “schools” lure them in with misleading marketing, charge a premium price for a crap education, and have the students pay for it with government guaranteed loans so you can pull more money out of them than they can afford and at no risk to the “school.” The students graduate (if the “school” doesn’t close first) and, just as they have to start paying their loans back, learn that they have a worthless degree from a school that provides no placement assistance.

    After having done exactly what society has said they should do to succeed, they find themselves a few years older, deep in debt, and unable to get the loans they need to get the education they need to get the job they need to pay back what your “schools” stole from them.

    In a just country, Gunderson would be out of a job and they people who run the schools he represents would be in debt to the attorneys they hired in an unsuccessful attempt to stay out of jail.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for eda Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for dryheat

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: