Ex-Congresswoman Seeks New Trial After Fraud Conviction

Bishop Rudolph W. McKissick, Sr. (left) escorts Former Congresswoman Corrine Brown (right) leaves the Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse on the arm of Bishop Rudolph W. McKissick, Sr. after being found guilty on 18 of 22 counts. (AP Photo/Bruce Lipsky/Florida Times-Union)
Bishop Rudolph W. McKissick, Sr., left,) escorts Former Congresswoman Corrine Brown outside the Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse on Thursday, May 11, 2017 in Jacksonville, Fla. Brown was found guilty of takin... Bishop Rudolph W. McKissick, Sr., left,) escorts Former Congresswoman Corrine Brown outside the Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse on Thursday, May 11, 2017 in Jacksonville, Fla. Brown was found guilty of taking money from a charity that was purported to be giving scholarships to poor students. (Bruce Lipsky/The Florida Times-Union via AP) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (AP) — Former U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown is seeking a new trial after a federal jury found her guilty of using a purported charity for poor children as a personal slush fund.

The Florida Times-Union reports attorneys for Brown filed a motion Thursday requesting a new trial. They argued the former congresswoman’s chief aide was behind the scheme to use the charity’s funds for lavish parties and other personal expenses.

Brown’s attorney, James Smith III, also argues prosecutors failed to prove Brown was aware of misdeeds by her former chief of staff.

Jurors found Brown guilty last month of 18 counts associated with taking money raised for the One Door for Education Foundation and lying on her taxes and congressional financial disclosure forms.
Brown’s sentencing has not been scheduled.
___
Information from: The (Jacksonville) Florida Times-Union, http://www.jacksonville.com

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Hey, maybe she can get a job at the Eric Trump Foundation.

  2. I don’t know why this is even newsworthy. These motions are filed in about 100% of convictions, and denied about 100% of the time.

    It’s kind of like reporting that the defendant continues to assert her innocence. What a shock!

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    She will change her name to trump and bleach her skin, and everyone will wonder what the fuss was.

  4. Doesn’t she know the script for this?

    It goes strong denials, half-hearted denials, tearful admission, revelation of a deeply personal issue like drug or gambling addiction, sequestration at an expensive rehab clinic (extra points if this rehab is known for hosting celebrities), “find Jesus,” “reconnect with your family” then throw yourself on the mercy of the court.

    That’s assuming, of course, that you’re guilty, and there’s ample proof – and at this point I am assuming she is, and there is.

    In which case she’s just digging herself a deeper hole. And you know what? That’s fine, seems like she probably deserves a pretty deep hole.

  5. Proves ‘Fair & Balanced.’

    Even TPM gets sucked into that vortex on occasion.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

1 more reply

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for twowolves Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for jsrtheta Avatar for coprophagoussmile Avatar for moniker

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: