Not All Conservatives Are Cheering On Alabama’s New Abortion Law

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 15:  House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) speaks as House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) looks on as speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 15, 2017 in Washington, DC.  Speaker Ryan and House Republicans discussed the Amercian Health Care Act.  (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 15: House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) speaks as House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) looks on as speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 15, 2017 in Washington, DC. S... WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 15: House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) speaks as House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) looks on as speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 15, 2017 in Washington, DC. Speaker Ryan and House Republicans discussed the Amercian Health Care Act. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Republican Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey’s signature on the strictest abortion law in the country has many pro-lifers cheering on the clear effort to challenge Roe v. Wade. But not all conservatives are pleased with the law.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) said Thursday that the Alabama law banning abortion without an exception for rape and incest goes too far.

“I believe in exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother, and that’s what I’ve voted on,” he said at his weekly press conference on Capitol Hill.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) similarly said that the law is too “extreme.”

Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel said that the law’s lack of an exception for rape and incest is “egregious.”

Conservative writer Erick Erickson was also wary of the law’s lack of an exception for rape and incest, arguing that he does not support making rape victims suffer by carrying a child to term.

“I also think we risk turning people against the cause by a dogmatic insistence on getting rid of an exception for rape,” he wrote. “We can pat ourselves on the back for our purity to the cause, but will ultimately doom our cause by treating a complicated issue as an easy choice of choosing the victim we cannot see for the victim we can see.”

Erickson wrote in a separate piece that there’s a chance the law could backfire on Republicans. He suggested that some conservative members of the Supreme Court could let Roe v. Wade stand, ultimately hurting President Trump’s reelection chances.

“Decisions that would preserve Roe, particularly with a Trump pick joining the majority, would depress some segments of the conservative movement that totally invested in the line that holding their noses to vote for Trump would see Roe overturned,” he wrote. “And that will matter in 2020.”

The Bulwark’s Jonathan Last made a similar argument, writing that the Alabama law “is the most damaging development to the pro-life movement in decade.”

“It will be overturned at the appellate level. It will almost certainly be denied certification by the Supreme Court. It will then disappear into the pro-choice direct mail machine where it will raise tens of millions of dollars for the groups who want unlimited, unfettered abortion on demand,” he wrote.

And even televangelist Pat Robertson called the Alabama law “extreme.”

“I think Alabama has gone too far, they’ve passed a law that would give a 99-year prison sentence to those who commit abortions,” he said Wednesday. “There’s no exception for rape or incest. It’s an extreme law and they want to challenge Roe v. Wade, but my humble view is that this is not the case we want to bring to the Supreme Court because I think this one’ll lose.”

Latest News
162
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy

    House Majority Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy

  2. These fuckin’ guys. I notice not one of these motherfuckers says “I oppose this law because it seeks to deny women rights to their own bodies.”

    Bastards.

  3. Bunch of hypocrites. Either the innocent baby who is also a victim is entitled to rights of the unborn, or their whole argument of religious belief is invalid.

  4. I thought all “babies” were equal and an “innocent” woman wouldn’t get pregnant after a rape. No?

  5. Yup. For sure, these states need a criminal investigation into the women for all rape claims, to ensure it’s a legitimate rape…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

156 more replies

Participants

Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for dwward Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for turdburgler Avatar for irasdad Avatar for zoester Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for lastroth Avatar for eb5 Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for tena Avatar for daulphin Avatar for nobiru Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for tiowally Avatar for tpr Avatar for kelaine Avatar for skeptical Avatar for godless Avatar for greenman66 Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for ANNFFL

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: