Commerce Secretary Refutes Notion That Unemployment Relief Impedes Job Growth

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 20: Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo testifies before the Senate Appropriations Committee during a hearing in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on April 20, 2021 in Washington,... WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 20: Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo testifies before the Senate Appropriations Committee during a hearing in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on April 20, 2021 in Washington, DC. Biden cabinet members, including Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, testified about the American Jobs Plan, the administration's $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan that has yet to win over a single Republican in Congress. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo on Sunday pushed back on the idea that unemployment relief is hurting the job market as Republican governors begin slashing jobless benefits in their states, arguing that the move would force more people to return to work.

During an interview on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” Raimondo was asked to weigh in on the notion that there is a correlation between unemployment benefits and the unexpected slowdown of hiring nationwide. On Friday, the Labor Department reported that U.S. employers added a modest 266,000 jobs last month, which falls short of the one million that economists had forecast and the weakest monthly gain since January, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Asked about the Biden administration’s take on the slowdown in hiring, Raimondo said that there is no data suggesting that Americans are out of work due to unemployment insurance.

Instead, Raimondo pointed to the fear of COVID-19 or the inability to find childcare as key reasons for why people aren’t able to go back to work.

Raimondo was then specifically asked about governors of states such as South Carolina and Montana that are rolling back unemployment benefits due to their belief that it has a negative impact on the job market. Republican lawmakers have expressed their opposition to enhanced unemployment payments and unanimously voted against extending them earlier this year.

After saying that it’s appropriate for governors in different regions to tailor their response to unemployment benefits depending on the circumstances within their regional labor market, the commerce secretary doubled down on denying that unemployment insurance is to blame for a job market that falls short of economists’ expectations.

“But if you look nationally, wages aren’t going up. People are still telling us the number one reason they’re not going back to work is fear due to the virus. And more people were looking for work last month than the month before,” Raimondo said. “So we are — I am engaged with businesses constantly listening, monitoring. But at the moment, it doesn’t seem to be that that’s the major impediment.”

Watch Raimondo’s remarks below:

Latest News
142
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. ["…the idea that unemployment relief is hurting the job market as Republican governors begin slashing jobless benefits in their states, arguing that the move would force more people to return to work…"]

    Starve 'em…get 'em to hate more…That’s the Ticket.

  2. Avatar for tena tena says:

    This is ridiculous. This is just a reframe of the old GOP anti-welfare argument.

  3. Really interested in learning what more data will tell us on this. During one of our company’s regular oversight meetings, a department VP was reporting difficulty with hiring new staff, and she said straight out that it was due to federal unemployment benefits, and that “no one wants to go back to work.” I was appalled and wondered how that went over with the rest of the folks on the call. Talking like that (voicing political opinions, as well laying blame like that, AND badmouthing your potential workforce!) is NOT part of our company culture, I’m happy to say.

  4. Absolutely. It’s the reactionaries go to on anything that helps people.
    Of course, if they told the truth – that they and their sponsors don’t want to pay anything to help others – they couldn’t garner as much sympathy as they can by creating an implicit contrast with the the “lazy.”

  5. Gee, don’t suppose companies could offer things like living wages that are better than unemployment benefits to encourage people to get back into the workforce.

    We never really did away with the slavery mentality in America, we just exchanged it for exploitation of the working class with nominal wages that are never quite enough to get by.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

136 more replies

Participants

Avatar for dalinker Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajm Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for becca656 Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for danny Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for tecmage Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for eddycollins Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for bcgister Avatar for kenga Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for bunnyvelour Avatar for visionseeker Avatar for kovie Avatar for JR_in_Mass

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: