New Minority Committee Report Details Rogue Police Force Investigating A Child, Costing Millions As Employees Watched Netflix

UNITED STATES - February 9: Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss.,(Photo by Caroline Brehman/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

An internal security force at the Commerce Department went rogue for years, investigating an elementary school child, wasting millions as sidelined employees whiled the days away watching Netflix and derailing careers with frivolous investigations, according to a new report produced by Ranking Member Roger Wicker’s (R-MS) minority staff at the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. 

The force, the Commerce Department Investigations and Threat Management Service (ITMS), was alleged to have engaged in numerous questionable practices by a fact sheet Wicker’s team put out in late May.

Democrats on the committee were not involved in the investigation. 

“The report was based on information received from whistleblowers who contacted Sen. Wicker’s office,” a committee aide for the Democratic majority told TPM. “We were supportive of their efforts to conduct oversight and their decision to keep those whistleblower interactions confidential. Since being notified of this issue we have been in close contact with the Department of Commerce and the Department of Commerce Office of Inspector General, and we appreciate their decision to stand down this group’s activities pending an investigation.”

The alleged practices of the ITMS, also detailed in a May Washington Post report, included disproportionately targeting for investigation employees of Chinese ancestry in the hope of discovering links to the Chinese government; surveilling officials’ social media accounts for criticism about the Trump administration’s handling of the Census; and leaving internal investigations open on purpose as a tool of intimidation. 

But the new full report includes additional anecdotes that paint a picture of a force out of control. 

In one instance, the report details ITMS agents opening an investigation into an elementary school child who wrote the department with a petition about adding a certain type of whale to a list of protected marine wildlife. 

“To any reasonable observer, the letter posed no threat to the Department,” the report said. “The ITMS, nonetheless, not only opened a case but conducted a search of the author’s name—a minor—in government databases like the FBI’s National Crime Information Center and the Department of Homeland Security’s Targeted Violence Information Sharing System.”

In another episode, the ITMS began investigating the entire staff of the Commerce Department Office of Executive Security for supposed security violations, according to the report. 

While ITMS conducted the investigation, the OES employees were sidelined and sequestered in conference rooms. While an ITMS official oversaw them, the employees reportedly resorted to watching Netflix, playing on their phones and making something called “Gummy Bear art” while on the clock. It cost about $1.1 million to the taxpayer and resulted in zero prosecutions, as the three referrals ITMS ultimately made to the Department of Justice were all declined, the report said. 

The report also provided more details about a training session for new ITMS agents that was detailed in the Post report back in May. Trainees reportedly had to follow supervisor George Lee, playing the “rabbit,” in government vehicles at extremely high speeds on rural roads in an area lacking cellular coverage. Lee, the report said, recruited “role players” to surprise armed and unsuspecting ITMS agents for simulations that took place in banks and government facilities. 

Lee also taught the trainees courses on forensic analytics, which, a whistleblower with expertise in the field told the report’s authors, made clear that he had no qualifications in or understanding of the subject. 

“Following two weeks of training, which cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars, no trainee passed the course,” the report said. “These training sessions lacked any form of accreditation, meaning it is likely that Lee made them up.” 

The report also alleges a series of episodes in which ITMS employees, either out of retaliation or an attempt to build an impressive casefile, opened frivolous internal investigations that resulted in everything from security clearance delay to full career derailment. 

One such investigation, the report said, was launched against a veteran who had been hired to establish internal controls on the unit, after he left. ITMS officials were trying to divine whether employees had leaked information to him after his departure. They reportedly referred to him as “Bone Chip” in a series of emails, a derogatory reference to his physical disability which required the use of a cane. 

In spite of no evidence found, the report said, three employees — all of whom were close with the official during his time at the department — had their access to sensitive compartmented information facilities (SCIFs) suspended. 

Other investigations into employees allegedly entailed reopening long-closed probes, and rehashing already completed background checks. 

The report also mentions briefly — without linking any documentation or citing a source — that ITMS “allegedly” investigated an unnamed lawmaker, a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives. The lawmaker had submitted a letter to then-Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in 2019 articulating opposition to processes used by the department in conducting the Census.

The report shows a department run amok, with agents donning facemasks and gloves to lockpick cabinets and scour digital records for evidence of employee wrongdoing. Employees with even the most tenuous ties to China were reportedly targeted even more than their colleagues. 

“Whistleblowers claim, for example, that agents were directed to run ethnic surnames through secure databases even in the absence of evidence suggesting potential risk to national security, indicating that immutable characteristics served as a pre-text for initiating investigations,” the report said.

The report closes with a series of recommendations, including for a review from the administration for any potential referrals of criminal misconduct to prosecutorial authorities stemming from closed ITMS investigations. 

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Why would Wicker publish such a report?
    What is his political agenda here?
    Who led the unit during the period in which the allegations took place?
    What Period of time did the allegations take place?
    What do Dem senate members have to say about the report?

  2. This is what Republicans want to turn the government agencies into…the fact that more of this didn’t happen during the Trump administration is simply because the leadership of other organizations has a long history of behaving properly and following the law and being professional in their investigations. Trump really, really wanted the FBI to do this kind of stuff, it looks like they were able to corrupt a minor group that isn’t supposed to be doing this stuff into going rogue.

    There should be legislation shutting this kind of thing down, we’ll see what the fallout is.

  3. How LONG did this go on? Decades? or just the previous 4 years? THis is horrifying. Good for Wicker to find/investigate this but WHY NOW? To embarrass Biden for not finding it right away?

  4. Your tax dollars at work. I’m quite sure this situation did not improve under the Previous Occupant.

  5. Here’s some facts that might shed some light on it. The report covers from 2006-2021. That is, the last 2 years of Bush, 8 years of Obama, 4 years of Shitgibbon, and six months of Biden. And yet, Bush’s name isn’t mentioned at all. Trump’s name is mentioned twice, both of which refer to his hiring of John Costello but that Costello wasn’t able to clean house before he left the Administration. Left unsaid is that Costello loudly left after 1/6 which he openly said was incited by Trump. Also left unsaid? Trump’s name in reference to every single bad act between 2017 and 2021. Biden’s name is mentioned three times after only six months in office.

    Obama? Nine times.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

46 more replies

Participants

Avatar for epicurus Avatar for DuckmanGR Avatar for sniffit Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for drriddle Avatar for lastroth Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for dlnyc Avatar for barbara63 Avatar for darrtown Avatar for jinnj Avatar for jtx Avatar for noonm Avatar for ptregillus Avatar for tpr Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for loss_mentality Avatar for justruss Avatar for Hatmama Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for Fire_Joni_Ernst Avatar for timbomov Avatar for ThatGuyOutsideYourBuilding

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: