Census Bureau Plays Coy On Major Voting Rights ‘Dispute’

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 24: U.S Census Bureau Director Steven Dillingham testifies before the House Oversight Committee on July 24, 2019 in Washington, DC.The hearing focused on the recent push by the Trump administration to include a citizenship question on the 2020 Census, which has since been abandoned. (Photo by Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 24: U.S Census Bureau Director Steven Dillingham testifies before the House Oversight Committee on July 24, 2019 in Washington, DC. The hearing focused on the recent push by the Trump administra... WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 24: U.S Census Bureau Director Steven Dillingham testifies before the House Oversight Committee on July 24, 2019 in Washington, DC. The hearing focused on the recent push by the Trump administration to include a citizenship question on the 2020 Census, which has since been abandoned. (Photo by Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

It took the Census Bureau two and half weeks, but the Bureau has finally provided a response to a simple but hugely consequential question posed to Census Director Steve Dillingham at a House hearing last month.

Dillingham was asked by Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) to confirm that citizenship data the Bureau was collecting under President Trump’s recent executive order would not be used for in the count it provides for doling out congressional seats among the states.

“Let me get back to you,” Dillingham said, appearing visibly confused by her question. He committed to submitting an answer in writing within the next 10 days.

The Constitution mandates that apportionment be based on “whole number of persons in each state.” That language is almost universally understood to mean that the apportionment count includes not just citizens, but noncitizens living in the United States, including those without legal status.

Yet Attorney General Bill Barr cast doubt on that understanding when he alluded to a “dispute” over apportionment in remarks about Trump’s citizenship data executive order.

It appeared to be a reference to a longshot Alabama lawsuit that is seeking to exclude undocumented immigrants from the apportionment count the Census Bureau provides. Doing so would boost the political power of rural, white states to the detriment of more diverse, urban states.

The Bureau’s written answers provided Friday also appeared to allude to that court case.

“The issue you asked about is currently in litigation and we do not comment on ongoing litigation, but the Census Bureau will fulfill its constitutional mandate to conduct a complete and accurate 2020 Census and enumerate all persons living in the United States of America,” the Bureau said, according to a spokesperson in Pressley’s office.

The Bureau missed the original deadline to supply the written response and had asked for an extension to submit it by Friday, which it did at the very end of the day.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Delay, delay, delay…THEN LIE!

    Drumpf’s “government” in action.

  2. So the asshole answered it with a non-answer. About what you’d expect from a toady working for this maladministration.

    These people keep holding out for more bites at the apple on this issue. It never fucking ends.

  3. Fuck these fucking fucktards.

  4. Saying they will conduct a complete census that ‘enumerates all persons living in the US,” leaves the answer completely open. It’s a non-answer constructed to say nothing. I hope congress goes right back and says give us an answer within 3 days. Period.

  5. Yes, the door is open. If a Trump judge says otherwise, this half-assed answer mean they will exclude non-citizens IF the judge agrees. Sad!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

13 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for zandru Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for go2goal Avatar for sfaw Avatar for jhand Avatar for gajake Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for rickjones Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for formerchild Avatar for birdford Avatar for machoneman Avatar for tpr Avatar for nycabj Avatar for outis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: