Biden Team Denies Pentagon Claim That Both Sides Agreed To ‘Holiday Pause’ Of Meetings

Acting US Defense Secretary Christopher Miller speaks as he welcomes Lithuanian Defense Minister Raimundas Karoblis to the Pentagon in Washington, DC, on November 13, 2020 (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM / AFP) (Photo by NIC... Acting US Defense Secretary Christopher Miller speaks as he welcomes Lithuanian Defense Minister Raimundas Karoblis to the Pentagon in Washington, DC, on November 13, 2020 (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM / AFP) (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS

The Biden transition team on Friday flatly denied the Pentagon’s claim that transition meetings had stopped for a mutually agreed-upon “holiday pause.” 

In fact, the transition’s executive director said, the Pentagon’s announcement of a holiday meeting break was evidence of  “isolated resistance” from a handful of political appointees in the Trump administration, including at the Department of Defense.

“There have been pockets of recalcitrants and DOD is one of them,” transition director Yohannes Abraham said at a press briefing Friday, distinguishing between political officials and career federal employees, who he said had cooperated with the transition. 

Axios first reported Friday that Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller had ordered “a Pentagon-wide halt to cooperation with the transition of President-elect Biden,” in the website’s words. Miller was installed in that role last month after the President fired the previous secretary, Mark Esper, in a tweet.

In a statement to TPM and others after that report, Miller said “After the mutually-agreed upon holiday pause, which begins tomorrow, we will continue with the transition and rescheduled meetings from today.” 

But Abraham, at the press briefing soon after, flatly denied that there was any agreement about a break. 

“Let me be clear: There was no mutually agreed-upon holiday break,” he said. “In fact, we think it’s important that briefings and other engagements continue during this period as there’s no time to spare, and that’s particularly true in the aftermath of the ascertainment delay.” 

Later, Abraham said Biden’s agency review team at the Pentagon was “informed yesterday that meetings were being pulled down, and they immediately and appropriately escalated it.”

In his earlier statement, Miller said that the Pentagon was “working to reschedule approximately 20 interviews with 40 officials until after January 1.” But Abraham said the transition team expected meetings to resume immediately.

TPM has reached out to the Pentagon again to ask for an explanation for the discrepancy.

Asked by PBS NewsHour’s Yamiche Alcindor if Miller had been dishonest, transition spokesperson Jen Psaki didn’t answer directly. 

“I think you can make your own judgments, Yamiche, about the information we’ve provided,” Psaki said. “It’s not in our interest to provide inaccurate information about the status of our engagements.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: