WSJ: Before His Ouster, Berman Beefed With DOJ Over COVID Letter To De Blasio

Geoffrey Berman, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, speaks at a news conference on March 25, 2019 in New York City. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Ex-U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman had a disagreement with top officials at the Justice Department the day before he was ousted over a letter the department wanted to send New York Mayor Bill De Blasio, the Wall Street Journal reported Monday.

The letter sought to bash De Blasio for COVID-19 public health orders that limited religious gatherings in the city, according to the Journal. The Justice Department was critical of the policy in light of lack of enforcement of social distancing orders against recent protests, the Journal said.

On Thursday, Berman refused to sign on to the letter, the Journal reported. He believed the letter to be a “political stunt” — in the Journal’s words — and worried that it would strain his office’s relationship with the city.

Berman had voiced his objections to the letter throughout the drafting process, but Attorney General Bill Barr was not a part of those discussion, the Journal said. DOJ Civil Rights Division head Eric Dreiband has been the signatory on similar letters that the department has sent to other state and local officials over their COVID-19 public health orders. Usually the local U.S. attorneys have signed on as well.

It is not clear if the disagreement over the De Blasio letter was a factor in Barr’s decision to get Berman fired by President Trump over the weekend. The two met in person in New York on Friday, hours before the department announced that Berman was being replaced. But the Journal could not confirm that De Blasio dust-up was discussed at the meeting.

The Justice Department, under the directive of Barr, has been on a spree of public statements chastising local and state officials for their coronavirus public health orders  — including orders that affect religious gatherings. Some of those statements have come in the form of legal filings that support private individuals challenging the orders in court. In other instances, the department has issued letters like the one Berman apparently refused to sign last week, or has pressured officials behind the scene to rethink their COVID-19 orders. The De Blasio letter has not been publicly issued.

Even before the Wall Street Journal report, there had been reporting of a vexed relationship between the Department of Justice headquarters in D.C. and the office that Berman led. (The Southern District of New York is sometimes called the “Sovereign District of New York” because of its independence streak.)

The office’s campaign finance charges against longtime Trump fixer Michael Cohen  notoriously referenced reference to Trump as “Individual-1” in its charging documents (Berman was recused from that prosecution). There’s been speculation that some of the continued SDNY probes into Trump allies, including former Mayor and Trump personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, may have been what led to Berman’s firing.

Some reports have also pointed to the interest that the Jay Clayton, the chair of the Security and Exchange Commission, had expressed to the administration about taking Berman’s job.

Clayton was announced as Trump’s choice to permanently replace Berman when the shake-up was announced Friday evening. Berman, however, refused to step down immediately, issuing an extraordinary press release later Friday that said the shake-up was news to him. He stepped down on Saturday after the department made clear that Berman’s current deputy would be allowed to lead the office in an acting capacity. The department had previously said that another U.S. attorney would take over for Berman in the interim.

Latest News
112
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Distractions. This wouldn’t be enough to get him fired. It all goes back to Epstein, and whatever SDNY is doing with the reams of stuff they collected from his place.

  2. Bill Barr in damage control mode. No chance all of this was over a dumb letter. It’s simply not believable.

    WSJ is either playing along or getting played.

  3. Plus, republicans have a habit of running to the WSJ when they want to plant a seed of a story and see if it gets wings.

  4. Why would LowBarr be worked up about a letter about a hoax virus?

  5. Not sufficient reason to bring in the NJ guy to warm the chair for Clayton.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

106 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for paulw Avatar for fgs Avatar for jw1 Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for danny Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for gr Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for tena Avatar for jim195 Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for allblues Avatar for carolson Avatar for zlj2011 Avatar for zillacop Avatar for jimharrington Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for haddockbranzini Avatar for powwow Avatar for ClutchCargo

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: