Intel Officials Debunk Barr Theory About Mass Foreign Counterfeiting Of Mail-In Ballots

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 28: Attorney General William Barr appears before the House Judiciary Committee on July 28, 2020 on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C. In his first congressional testimony in more than a year, Barr ... WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 28: Attorney General William Barr appears before the House Judiciary Committee on July 28, 2020 on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C. In his first congressional testimony in more than a year, Barr is expected to face questions from the committee about his deployment of federal law enforcement agents to Portland, Oregon, and other cities in response to Black Lives Matter protests; his role in using federal agents to violently clear protesters from Lafayette Square near the White House last month before a photo opportunity for President Donald Trump in front of a church; his intervention in court cases involving Trump’s allies Roger Stone and Michael Flynn; and other issues. (Photo by Matt McClain-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS

The FBI has no evidence supporting a sensationalist theory pushed by President Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr that foreign powers could hijack mail-in elections by mass counterfeiting absentee ballots, according to reports of a press briefing held by U.S. intelligence officials Wednesday.

An FBI official told reporters on the briefing that the agency had “no information about any nation state” engaging in such a plot, according to NPR’s report on the briefing.

The comment came as the officials on the briefing more broadly described mail-in voting as safe from foreign intervention, according to the New York Times report.

However, the officials declined to address whether foreign actors, including Russia, were exploiting Trump’s baseless claims to help to spread disinformation about the election, according to CNN.

In the 2016 election, Russia’s election meddling on social media included messaging that amplified false claims about fraud, while using other tactics to suppress votes.

Both Justice Department and congressional investigators who have probed the 2016 meddling effort have noted that Russia social media disinformation campaign has continued.

Barr first floated the theory that vote-by-mail could be vulnerable to foreign interference in a New York Times interview, after Trump had gone all in on attacking the expansion of mail-in voting that was happening due to the pandemic.

Trump has since echoed Barr’s false claim that vote-by-mail is vulnerable to foreign efforts to flood election officials with fake ballots.

Scores of election officials and other experts have pointed to all the flaws in Barr’s theory, including the U.S.’s localized approach to elections and the various security checks that are in place for absentee voting, that make the scheme Barr described impossible to implement.

Barr has refused to back down from it, however. At a July House hearing where lawmakers pressed him on theory, he claimed it was “common sense” that foreign actors could try such a maneuver, even while acknowledging that he had no evidence to back up the claims.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: