Attorney general nominee William Barr on Tuesday startled Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) by saying he hadn’t “looked at” whether the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship.
The amendment does, in fact, say that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…”
“It says right there in the 14th Amendment,” Hirono protested, asking if Barr would like to do away with the legal right ensured by the amendment.
“I haven’t looked at that issue legally, that’s the kind of issue I would ask [the Office of Legal Counsel] to advise me on, as to whether it’s something that’s appropriate for legislation, I don’t even know the answer to that,” Barr replied.
In October, President Donald Trump told Axios that birthright citizenship “has to end.” Constitutional scholars say another constitutional amendment — not an act of Congress or an executive order, as Trump suggested — would be needed to eliminate birthright citizenship.
Hirono: Do you believe birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment?"
Barr: I haven't looked at that issue.
The 14th Amendment: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States… pic.twitter.com/5QEdemHR2h
— Matt Shuham (@mattshuham) January 15, 2019
They have decided not to keep the Democracy given to us.
Monsters all.
Then Barr is not necessarily a US citizen. Hmmm.
“You’re mistaken. You only think it means that.”
Gaslighting Old Perverts
For a nominee to the position of AG, Barr is ignorant of what I consider basics in the Constitution. He doesn’t know what’s in the emoluments clause, and he’s not familiar with birthright citizenship. Hey, Trump! Pick me!
Wow, just wow. I thought legal precedent is what guide legal thought? How can one toss out the language in the 14th Amendment? How may cases have been built upon the words written 150 years ago?