Barr Defends Trump Church Photo-Op: POTUS ‘Should Be Able To Walk One Block From WH’

US Attorney General William Barr attends a roundtable discussion with law enforcement officials on police and community relations hosted by US President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room at the White House in Was... US Attorney General William Barr attends a roundtable discussion with law enforcement officials on police and community relations hosted by US President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, DC, June 8, 2020. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Attorney General Bill Barr on Monday evening defended President Trump’s surprise photo-op in front of St. John’s Episcopal Church last week that occurred after peaceful protesters outside the White House were forcibly dispersed.

When asked by Fox News’ Bret Baier about whether he’d do anything differently about the President’s church photo-op that he and other Trump administration officials also participated in, Barr replied “no” before going on to argue that the image from the church photo-op “has somewhat been created and miscreated,” which he said was due to how videos capturing “all the violence that was happening preceding that” have not been aired.

After Barr claimed that he personally saw two projectiles thrown at him, Baier pressed him on whether he would do anything differently regarding the walk over to the church, saying that the visual of an “all white, mostly male” image prompted many to think that it “wasn’t a good thing for the President in retrospect.”

Barr replied that the church photo-op was “a decision for the White House and the President to make.”

“I don’t say this as a critic of these kinds of leadership decisions made at the White House, but as I have said, the President of the United States should be able to walk one block from the White House out to the church of presidents,” Barr said. “He should be able to do that. And this canard that this exercise was done to make that possible is totally false. I don’t see anything wrong with the President walking over to the church.”

Earlier Monday, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany told reporters during a briefing that there are “no regrets” regarding the forcible removal of peaceful protesters ahead of Trump’s church photo-op last week.

Watch Barr’s remarks below:

Latest News
137
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Bull crap Barr
    It’s not the walk, it was the gassing of peaceful people and then trump waving a book he has never read. And he stood in front of a church after gassing people. Violence and then claiming Christianity. Even Pat Robertson was appalled.
    Mr Barr, gassing folk and beating them with batons in the Name of Jesus will not get your man elected.
    One other thing Mr Barr …those grenades had CS gas in them and hard rubber pellets that bruise at up to 50 feet distant.

    So don’t try to bullshit me and say there was no chemical involved.
    Mr Barr, please inform your boss that if he turns the Army on us he will get removed from office before the election… not by us but very likely by the Army. And he IS gonna get voted off the island for sure.

  2. Absolutely, however, citizens exercising their constitutional right to protest also should be able to do so without being chemically assaulted during a police riot.

  3. If all he had done was walk over to the church (even under guard) no one would be complaining you fat fucking fuck. It’s that he had, by your order no less, citizens and peaceful protesters gassed and shot at with ‘less lethal’ weaponry. But you knew that you fat, fat, fucking fuck!

  4. Barr doesn’t seem to have grasped the fact that he has zero credibility with thinking people.

    He’s a tool, and everyone knows it.
    And no one believes him.

  5. …the President of the United States should be able to walk one block from the White House out to the church of presidents,” Barr said.

    Certainly, he should be able to do that.
    But that he doesn’t feel unafraid doing it is an insufficient pretext for making it possible by force.
    And it certainly doesn’t excuse his threatening to turn the US Army on what were, in the main, peaceful protestors exercising their right to assemble and petition for redress of their grievances.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

131 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ghost Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for douglashh Avatar for inversion Avatar for yskov Avatar for psudawnc Avatar for lastroth Avatar for careysub Avatar for pshah Avatar for jinnj Avatar for wintermoon Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for caltg Avatar for demyankee Avatar for Anarchy_Bunker Avatar for wickedwillie64 Avatar for canyoncountry Avatar for greysea Avatar for maximus Avatar for justruss Avatar for garzooma Avatar for redpill Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: