Austin Police Chief Labels Serial Bomber A ‘Domestic Terrorist’ For The First Time

The scene near Galindo Street in Austin, Texas on March 12, 2018 where a woman in her 70s was injured in an explosion. The incident was the second reported explosion on Monday and the third in two weeks. Two parcel b... The scene near Galindo Street in Austin, Texas on March 12, 2018 where a woman in her 70s was injured in an explosion. The incident was the second reported explosion on Monday and the third in two weeks. Two parcel bombs rattled the US city of Austin on Monday, March 12, 2018, ten days after a similar deadly blast, as Texas police said they were investigating the possibility that the attacks were serial hate crimes. The explosions came as Austin, the state capital and a metropolis of two million people, welcomed hundreds of thousands of visitors for the massive South by Southwest entertainment and media festival. / AFP PHOTO / SUZANNE CORDEIRO (Photo credit should read SUZANNE CORDEIRO/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The Austin police chief says a “domestic terrorist” set off a series of explosions that killed two people and severely wounded four others in the Texas capital.

Chief Brian Manley had previously hesitated to label the bombings domestic terrorism, citing the ongoing investigation.

But at a meeting Thursday on the police and community response to the bombings, Manley labeled the accused bomber a “domestic terrorist for what he did to us.”

Mark Conditt blew himself up as authorities approached on March 21. He had planted bombs that terrorized Austin for weeks.

Manley previously called Conditt a “very troubled young man,” drawing criticism that the bomber would have been labeled a terrorist more quickly if he had not been a white man.

Latest News
9
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. White Christianist* terrorist would be more accurate but domestic terrorist is a move in the right direction.

    * ...those on the fringes of the religious right who have used the Gospels to perpetuate their own aspirations for power, control and oppression: Christianists. They are as anathema to true Christians as the Islamists are to true Islam.
  2. While this is a good thing in terms of the fight against racism and bigotry, I’d prefer to see minorities not being labeled terrorists (i.e. being called “troubled young men/women”) rather than more white people being labeled terrorists.

    The more the T-word get used, the easier it becomes to enact draconian measures that eclipse human rights.

    But that’s a pipie dream, I suppose, so this is the best we can hope for.

  3. “Manley previously called Conditt a ‘very troubled young man,’ drawing criticism that the bomber would have been labeled a terrorist more quickly if he had not been a white man.”

    Let’s analyze this using The Fox Terrorism Checklist™:

    1. An act of murderous violence? (Check)

    2. By a religious fanatic? (Check)

    3. Who was radicalized by an extremist ideology? (Check)

    4. And is a brown Muslim? D’oh! So, so close…

    Well, as everyone can plainly see, definitely not a “terrorist”.

    Just a “lone wolf” suffering from “mental illness”.

    Nothing we can do about it…

  4. Christian extremist? Christian terrorist?

  5. Of course it was domestic terrorism, what the fuck else would it be…community dislike? Sad.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

3 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for wagonmound Avatar for demyankee Avatar for tindalos Avatar for jakebarnes Avatar for loss_mentality

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: