Apple To Pay $450 Million After SCOTUS Rejects E-Book Price Fixing Appeal

ARCHIV - ILLUSTRATION - Ein iPad Tablet mit einer Bücherwand auf dem Bildschirm, im Hintergrund ein Bücherregal (Aufnahme vom 06.10.2011). Mit dem iPad hat Apple im Jahr 2010 das E-Book-Geschäft umgekrempelt. Die... ARCHIV - ILLUSTRATION - Ein iPad Tablet mit einer Bücherwand auf dem Bildschirm, im Hintergrund ein Bücherregal (Aufnahme vom 06.10.2011). Mit dem iPad hat Apple im Jahr 2010 das E-Book-Geschäft umgekrempelt. Die damaligen Deals mit der Buchbranche sorgen aber für ein juristisches Nachspiel: Apple legt sich vor Gericht mit US-Wettbewerbshütern an. Photo by: Marc Tirl/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court rejected an appeal from Apple Inc. Monday and left in place a ruling that the company conspired with publishers to raise electronic book prices when it sought to challenge Amazon.com’s dominance of the market.

The justices’ order on Monday lets stand an appeals court ruling that found Cupertino, California-based Apple violated antitrust laws in 2010.

Apple wanted to raise prices to wrest some book sales away from Amazon, which controlled 90 percent of the market and sold most popular books online for $9.99. Amazon’s share of the market dropped to 60 percent.

The 2-1 ruling by the New York-based appeals court sustained a trial judge’s finding that Appleorchestrated an illegal conspiracy to raise prices. A dissenting judge called Apple’s actions legal, “gloves-off competition.”

The Justice Department and 33 states and territories originally sued Apple and five publishers. The publishers all settled and signed consent decrees prohibiting them from restricting e-book retailers’ ability to set prices.

In settlements of lawsuits brought by individual states, Apple has agreed to pay $400 million to be distributed to consumers and $50 million for attorney fees and payments to states.

The case is Apple v. U.S., 15-565.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

3
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Whoa! This is a victory for consumers, finally. A real surprise given the horrendous track record of the RATS on the Roberts SCotUS.

  2. Gotta say, the last couple of weeks of SCOTUS news have me smiling and saying, “You know what GOP? Keep holding your breath on the President’s next nominee. I think we can take it longer than you…”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for firewing2

Continue Discussion