Angus King Is ‘Reluctant’ To Nix Filibuster, But Would Do So For Voting Rights

UNITED STATES - APRIL 27: Sen. Angus King, I-Maine,  conducts a news conference after the Democratic Senate Policy luncheon in Hart Building on Tuesday, April 27, 2021. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
UNITED STATES - APRIL 27: Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, conducts a news conference after the Democratic Senate Policy luncheon in Hart Building on Tuesday, April 27, 2021. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Angus King (I-ME) on Sunday said that although he is “very reluctant” to nuke the filibuster, he is willing to nix the legislative procedure to pass voting rights legislation.

Asked about Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-WV) opposition to the House-passed For the People Act and whether he supports the sweeping voting rights legislation as written, King said he does not because there are provisions he believes can be modified.

“It’s a 800- or 900- or 1,000-page bill. There are clearly some things I think need to be negotiated,” King said. “And I think Joe Manchin realizes that.”

After stressing that the “guts” of the bill is voting rights, King expanded on his issues with the For the People Act, which proposes major election reforms that lower barriers to voting.

“There are two things going on with voting rights. One is getting a lot of publicity, the other not so much. The publicity is about things like limiting absentee ballots and the early voting and all of those kinds of things,” King said.

“The other piece, though, that isn’t being talked about is, a lot of states are considering changes that the legislature could essentially overturn the results of an election in their state,” King added.

Citing Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s (R) refusal to buy into baseless allegations of election fraud in the 2020 presidential election, King said that he is concerned about how GOP-led legislatures would take advantage if the sweeping voting rights bill is passed without any modifications.

“I’m worried that they’re going to turn that over and say, OK, a Republican legislature can say, we think there was fraud in Fulton County, and, therefore, we’re going to certify a different set of electors,” King said. “That’s really dangerous.”

Pressed on whether he would be ready to eliminate the filibuster, King replied that he is “very reluctant” to do so, but would come around to it when it comes to voting rights legislation.

“But if it comes down to voting rights and the rights of Americans to go to the polls and select their leaders versus the filibuster, I will choose democracy,” King said.

The remarks from King, who caucuses with Democrats, come amid Sens. Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema’s (D-AZ) opposition to eliminating or reforming the filibuster to push the Biden administration’s legislative agenda through he Senate.

Manchin reaffirmed his commitment to preserving the filibuster in an op-ed published in the Charleston Gazette-Mail on Sunday that declared his opposition to the For the People Act that his Democratic colleagues are trying to push through the Senate.

“I will not vote to weaken or eliminate the filibuster,” Manchin wrote. “For as long as I have the privilege of being your U.S. senator, I will fight to represent the people of West Virginia, to seek bipartisan compromise no matter how difficult and to develop the political bonds that end divisions and help unite the country we love.”

Watch King’s remarks below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. The sane half of Maine chimes in.

    Correctly.

  2. "I will fight to represent the people of West Virginia, to seek bipartisan compromise no matter how difficult and to develop the political bonds that end divisions and help unite the country we love.”

    Translation, I have no problems with Republicans doing whatever they can to tear down democracy.

  3. Avatar for jinnj jinnj says:

    King clearly articulates the most insidious element of this GOP voter suppression evil. - the granting of a nullification option to state legislatures … a craven dishonest feature that would give legislatures the ability to say F-you to the majority and essentially “veto” the will of the people.

  4. Avatar for tena tena says:

    What we are doing with this legislation is fighting the poisonous partisan legislation the GOP has passed in the states. It’s not partisan - it is anti-partisan, Joe. Get a fucking clue.

    Thank you Angus for getting it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

50 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for marby Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for irasdad Avatar for danny Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for addicted4444 Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for jinnj Avatar for rocklaverve Avatar for massie Avatar for Anarchy_Bunker Avatar for enn Avatar for bcgister Avatar for ericm Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for antropovni Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for Scoutmom Avatar for Musgrove5

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: