Afghans Welcome Trump’s Harsh Words For Pakistan

President Donald Trump speaks at Fort Myer in Arlington Va., Monday, Aug. 21, 2017, during a Presidential Address to the Nation about a strategy he believes will best position the U.S. to eventually declare victory in Afghanistan. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
President Donald Trump speaks at Fort Myer in Arlington Va., Monday, Aug. 21, 2017, during a Presidential Address to the Nation about a strategy he believes will best position the U.S. to eventually declare victory i... President Donald Trump speaks at Fort Myer in Arlington Va., Monday, Aug. 21, 2017, during a Presidential Address to the Nation about a strategy he believes will best position the U.S. to eventually declare victory in Afghanistan. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Afghans on Tuesday welcomed U.S. President Donald Trump’s harsh words for Pakistan in a speech outlining his strategy for the war-torn country that critics said offered little in the way of details and ruled out nation-building.

Abdullah Abdullah, Afghanistan’s second most powerful official behind the president, said in a news conference that the U.S. strategy marks a unique opportunity to achieve peaceful objectives in the region.

“The regional aspect of this strategy is very clear. It shows that the problem was very well identified,” he said.

Meanwhile, Trump said U.S. troops had a single-point agenda and that was to eliminate extremist fighters.

“We are not nation-building again,” he said Monday night. “We are killing terrorists.”

Trump accused Pakistan of giving extremists a safe haven, while next door in Afghanistan they kill U.S. troops. He said he wanted “immediate” results without saying what actions the United States might take against Pakistan if it ignored his warning.

But analysts in Pakistan warned that isolating Islamabad as the only culprit could increase the influence of regional players like Russia, China and even Iran.

Imtiaz Gul, executive director of the Islamabad-based Center for Research and Security Studies, said of Trump’s accusations: “This has been the same narrative for the last 15 years. He just upped the ante by being more belligerent or hostile.” Gul warned that the president’s words could drive a wedge deeper into a region that needs cooperation if it is to find a peaceful end to Afghanistan’s protracted conflict.

The U.S. and Afghanistan have routinely accused Pakistan — and particularly its powerful intelligence agency the ISI — of harboring insurgents and of waging a selective war, attacking those insurgents it considers its enemy and allowing those it has been known to use as proxies, either against hostile neighbors India or Afghanistan, to flourish.

Prior to Trump’s speech Monday, Pakistan’s military spokesman Maj. Gen. Asif Ghafoor refused to speculate on what the U.S. president might say, but said it was clear he anticipated criticism, saying: “There is no organized network of terrorists in Pakistan and actions have been taken without any discrimination against all terrorist organizations.”

Meanwhile, many Afghans interviewed by The AP in the capital Kabul expressed fears of a worsening situation in the country, bemoaning runaway corruption, high unemployment and increasingly deadly attacks. Several said Trump made it clear that he wasn’t about solving those problems.

Aziz Rahman, who works at a bank in Kabul, said Trump’s speech will make little difference to Afghans. After 16 years and tens of thousands of U.S. and NATO troops in his homeland, Rahman said the situation has only deteriorated with thousands of people fleeing.

“Trump’s speech is good for Americans, not for the poor people of Afghanistan,” Rahman said.

Waheed Muzhda, a political analyst in Kabul, expressed fear that Trump’s emphasis on a military victory seemed guaranteed to prolong the war and increase casualties.

“In the future we will witness a worsening of the war, more killing and more problems for the Afghan nation,” said Muzhda. “Mr. Trump only emphasized winning the war militarily, but if a military solution to the war could have been possible, this should have been achieved with presence of 150,000 troops.”

Meanwhile, the top U.S. diplomat in Kabul said President Trump made it clear that the U.S. “is not going anywhere,” but at the same time warning the Afghan government that it, too, has much to do if stability is to come to the country.

Special Charge d’Affaires at the U.S. Embassy Ambassador Hugo Llorens in a statement Tuesday urged the Afghan government to deal with widespread corruption, make good on a promise to hold parliamentary polls next year and enact tough economic reforms.

He also called on Afghanistan’s leadership to shed their ethnic differences and embrace each other.

Trump has not yet appointed a new ambassador to Kabul.

____

Gannon reported from Islamabad. Associated Press writers Amir Shah in Kabul and Munir Ahmed in Islamabad contributed to this report

Latest News
10
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Special Charge d’Affaires at the U.S. Embassy Ambassador Hugo Llorens in a statement Tuesday urged the Afghan government to deal with widespread corruption, make good on a promise to hold parliamentary polls next year and enact tough economic reforms.

    He also called on Afghanistan’s leadership to shed their ethnic differences and embrace each other.

    Trump has not yet appointed a new ambassador to Kabul.

    Italics supplied; because they’re about as much use as these pieties from the charge’. The last line rather neatly sums it all up. Sorry, Mr. “President”, this changes nothing. Now, about those tax returns…

  2. I’d qualify that headline. "Some Afghans…” Abdullah Abdullah “Afghanistan’s second most powerful official” is a cross-cultural person, son of a Tajik mom and a Pashto dad, and speaking Farsi.

  3. So Trump’s Paki-bashing now…
    Typical behavior for a Skinhead.
    Squirrelly cover-up notwithstanding.

  4. As an old guy who remembers Nixon waging a secret war in Cambodia for the reason that they were supporting the Viet Cong, and remembering how well that turned out, hearing Trump go after Pakistan gave me deja vu goose bumps.

    We continue to wage war against an idea, and you cannot kill an idea by killing more and more people. For Trump to lead the U.S. in violence against any country, idea, or person, automatically puts us on the losing side because of who Trump is and what he represents to the rest of the world - both our allies and our enemies. The dictators and strong men of the world have already figured out how to use Trump the same way the Republicans use him at home - as an occasionally useful idiot.

  5. Is ANYBODY surprised that Trump’s “New Way Forward in Afghanistan” is nothing more than a DICK-WAVING EXERCISE?

    Vague promises, accusing Pakistan of being “disloyal” (duh! they CREATED the Taliban) and just enough US Troops to get a bunch more of them killed.

    All I can hear when I listen to this fool is “Nixon Invading Cambodia” and we all know how well that turned out.

    What is it with Tiny-Trump rattling sabres at countries that have Nuclear Weapons?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for epicurus Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for demyankee Avatar for birdford Avatar for outsidertrading618

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: