Counterintelligence Experts Explain Why Mar-a-Lago Is A Security Disaster

President-elect Donald Trump waves to members of the media after a meeting with admirals and generals from the Pentagon at Mar-a-Lago, in Palm Beach, Fla., Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2016. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Mar-a-Lago has recently been revealed as a hub for influence peddlers and potential spies, leading to accusations from top Democrats and pundits that Trump’s winter White House doubles as a sieve for classified information.

But what precisely makes it such a disaster for officials looking guard the nation’s secrets?

Presidents regularly take selfies with random fans, exposing them to possible reputational risk. And it’s not new for the Secret Service to confront espionage issues — agents are expected to provide more than just physical security for the president. 

Former Secret Service and counterintelligence agents told TPM that Mar-a-Lago distinguishes itself in how it combines traditional weak points — a set pattern of repeat visits, public access — with an incautious boss and a profit motive that appears to override all else. Mar-a-Lago is an active club with regularly scheduled events, increasing the amount of people passing through a place that also doubles as a presidential residence.

“It’s still an operating business that has people who are not affiliated or associated with the President or government having access to the location,” said Jeffrey Ringel, a 21-year FBI veteran who works as a director at Soufan Group, a security intelligence firm. “It makes it an easy target. It gives people more time to plan out if they want to do some sort of eavesdropping mission.”

Loose lips sink ships

Allegations that Mar-a-Lago is a massive intelligence risk have been percolating since Trump took office.

Former CIA agent Cindy Otis told TPM that Mar-a-Lago combines different risks that could be mitigated on their own but, when kept together, morph into one bigger problem.

“Mar-a-Lago is a destination for not just the President but people who are close to the President,” Otis said. “He holds a lot of conversations there, he talks openly about different policy issues there, so it’s a prime target for intelligence services.”

The president famously afforded Mar-a-Lago club members a front-row seat to his response to a February 2017 missile scare involving North Korea. 

But the past month’s scandal around Cindy Yang and the March 30 arrest of Yujing Zhang turbocharged both the concerns around Mar-a-Lago and, according to the Miami Herald, a pre-existing counterintelligence investigation into Chinese spying at the Winter White House.

Congressional Democrats have called for investigations into the issue, while the Government Accountability Office recently completed its own probe of the Secret Service’s role at Mar-a-Lago.

Public-private partnership

The Secret Service, an organization whose primary mission is physical protection of the president and family, finds itself in a new position at Mar-a-Lago. There, it has to cope not only with the demands of White House staff, but with commercial decisions by club management. 

The Secret Service hinted at this issue in an April 2 statement issued following initial reports of Zhang’s arrest.

“The Secret Service does not determine who is invited or welcome at Mar-a-Lago; this is the responsibility of the host entity,” the Secret Service said. “The Mar-a-Lago club management determines which members and guests are granted access to the property.”

Yang’s business of charging random wealthy Chinese for access reveals how essentially anyone with cash can gain access, with Zhang’s bizarre arrest providing a concrete example.

Part of the issue, experts said, is that the Palm Beach club isn’t a one-off destination like a fundraising dinner or campaign stop — it’s a secondary residence for the president, meaning that the Secret Service must have a permanent presence at the club, former FBI agent Larry Johnson told TPM.

“They have to work with the White House staff so they can run their business,” he said. “You have to give up something to get something.”

Douglas Smith, a former assistant secretary of homeland security, described the problem to TPM as one of being a “set pattern.”

Mar-a-Lago is in many ways a public compound, there are hundreds of people, it’s a pay-to-play kind of thing there,” he said. “As far as the Secret Service goes, they’re not vetting the membership. If Trump Org cashes the check, that’s that.”

The extent of the problem arguably remains behind closed doors. We know about Cindy Yang’s access-peddling thanks to Patriots owner Robert Kraft’s alleged solicitation of prostitution at a spa Yang owned. Former Secret Service director Ralph Basham pointed out that the reason we know about Zhang is because she was apprehended.

“It’s a very difficult position that the Secret Service finds itself in,” Basham said. “You have a public place, and they really don’t have total control over the security.

“But in this case, the process worked,” he added.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. You don’t need an expert to explain why Mar-a-Grifto is a security disaster. Trump spends a lot of time there. 'Nuff said.

  2. Imagine if Hillary tried having a palace of ill repute for America’s richest and most corrupt rich scum bags as her primary residence while president!

  3. Have we impeached the son of a bitch-and-a-Klansman yet?

    I’m asking for a friend…

  4. There’s another angle at work here. There’s great value to the intelligence community and law enforcement in general in keeping Americans convinced there are threats EVERYWHERE. That is extremely important because it’s used as justification of suspension of our civil rights, spying on Americans, unwarranted surveillance and other intrusions that keep the masses under control. Even though Trump is a total chump and has no idea what he’s doing, he’s inadvertently proving that there isn’t a threat under every bush and bridge. If Americans start to realize that the over-hyped bullshit about “national security” is just that…bullshit, nearly every time, then the very existence of our surveillance state comes under question. Mar-a-Lago is a security disaster because Trump is a disaster. But, the US is NOT under threat from any other nation on the planet. Our obscene defense budget desperately depends on our government constantly reinforcing the idea that we’re in danger 24/7, and that we need unlimited funds to be spent on the battle against the boogie-man.

  5. See Eisenhower’s valedictory speech on the military-industrial complex.

    Here’s the nut 'graph:

    Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

    This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

    In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

    We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
    (Emphasis added.)

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

51 more replies

Participants

Avatar for pol Avatar for fgs Avatar for jeffgee1 Avatar for enon Avatar for doctorbiobrain Avatar for wanderer Avatar for tacoma Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for murgatroid Avatar for gr Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for bboerner Avatar for dickweed Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for junebug Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for Ken_a_roni Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for erratum Avatar for dogmaalsocatma

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: