This was too much, even for John Bolton.
Trump’s former national security adviser makes multiple cameos in Ambassador William Taylor’s bombshell House testimony Tuesday.
And at nearly every point, the notorious hawk comes out swinging against President Trump’s scheme to withhold military aid to Ukraine unless until Kyiv became an active partner in conducting beneficial investigations for the President’s reelection bid.
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) told reporters after hearing the testimony that it “confirmed” the need for Bolton to appear before congressional investigators examining whether Trump should be impeached.
In Taylor’s testimony, Bolton first appears at a July 10 meeting at the White House with Ukrainian officials.
Trump was absent but, in Taylor’s telling, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland linked the topic of “investigations” with a potential meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Trump.
In so doing, Sondland “so irritated Ambassador Bolton that he abruptly ended the meeting,” according to Taylor.
The two people at the meeting who related this information to Taylor – National Security Council staffers Fiona Hill and Alexander Vindman – said that Bolton ended the meeting, and told Hill to “brief the lawyers.” Bolton then began to refer to the enterprise as a “drug deal,” and went on to oppose what would become the July 25 call between Trump and Zelensky out of a belief that it “would be a disaster.”
Bolton then disappears from the narrative, before returning in late August.
The then-national security adviser was on a trip to Eastern Europe, stopping in both Ukraine and Belarus. Bolton arrived in Ukraine on Aug. 27, holding meetings with Zelensky and top Ukrainian officials.
Public reporting about the trip – one of Bolton’s last as national security adviser – suggested that he focused mostly on Ukraine’s security situation with respect to Russia and to China.
Taylor wrote that the withholding of security assistance did not come up, in part because the Ukrainians at that time were unsure what was going on.
“Amazingly, news of the hold did not leak out until August 29,” Taylor wrote.
He added that he “was all too aware” of it, and met with Bolton privately, expressing “serious concern” about the withholding of aid.
Bolton told Taylor to send a first-person cable to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, expressing his concerns.
Taylor said that he sent the cable, but it’s not clear what happened after that. He wrote that Pompeo supposedly took the cable in to a White House meeting on “security assistance for Ukraine.”
Bolton reappears just days before his Sept. 10 firing.
Sondland and Trump held a phone call on Sept. 7, during which the President allegedly told the EU ambassador that while he “was not asking for a ‘quid pro quo,'” he wanted Zelensky to “go to a microphone and say he is opening investigations of Biden and 2016 election interference.”
Tim Morrison, an NSC official who was in touch with Taylor during the period, then said that he told Bolton “and NSC lawyers of this phone call.”
Bolton was fired on Sept. 10. On Sept. 11, the aid was released to Ukraine.
First a White House meeting, then add in military assistance.
Moving the goal posts is standard in the Trump/Reactionary playbook and, so, the story is utterly credible.
Of course, if it was Nunes, it’s be ‘udderly,’ but there’s no reason to go there here.
Not yet, anyway: Devin’s been markedly unheard from of late.
OT but notable:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/22/nyregion/trump-skating-rinks.html?action=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage§ion=New%20York
They covered up the “Trump” with a tarp – which wasn’t big enough, so you still see the “T”:
Interesting snippets from the article:
The “brand” is now radioactive – and will probably continue to disappear. Betcha it’ll be totally gone in the not too distant future.
Fortunately for us a perfect analogy: his cover ups don’t seem to be quite big enough, either.
The Extortionist-In-Chief tweeted that he informed Bolton that his services were no longer needed and
I guess that was NOT the main reason why Bolton was ‘fired’ or resigned after all…the disagreed strongly part was most likely Ukrainegate…
Solicitation wrt to election from Ukraine then later China + Coverup by hiding the transcript + Quid Pro Quo/Extortion using Congress appropriated aid for Personal Gain = all that just wrt to Ukraine!
If Ukrainegate was to much for Bolton, what would he think wrt to Turkey and the Extorionist-In-Chief facilitation of the genocide of our allies?
When is Bolton going to testify in Congress?
Other than his money laundering ring and pillaging the US taxpayer, this was his only real money maker. Screw impeachment, this will set him off quicker than a blowtorch at a gas station.