Trump Tries To Block Discovery In Emoluments Case

WASHINGTON, DC  - JULY 26: The main entrance drive way for the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., July 26, 2018. (Astrid Riecken For The Washington Post)
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 26: The main entrance drive way for the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., July 26, 2018. (Astrid Riecken For The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Justice Department is trying to prevent state attorneys general from beginning the discovery process against President Donald Trump in one of the pending emoluments lawsuits against him.

In a late Nov. 30 filing in the case, DOJ attorneys told a federal court in Maryland that discovery in the case should not proceed until appeals in the case can be heard.

U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte had previously declined Trump’s request to dismiss the case and had declined to allow Trump to appeal that decision immediately. The Justice Department indicated in the filing that the solicitor general is planning to appeal both decisions to the 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, and to seek a stay of proceedings in the lower court.

“Accordingly, the President does not believe that discovery should commence now but should await the Court of Appeals’ resolutions of the mandamus petition and stay application,” the feds wrote in the filing. “If this Court nevertheless finds that discovery should proceed now, then the President does not object to the discovery schedule proposed by Plaintiff.”

The state attorneys general for Maryland and the District of Columbia sued Trump in June for allegedly violating the Constitution’s emoluments clause, arguing that by allowing his Pennsylvania Avenue hotel to receive visits from foreign officials and by having federal officials maintain financial relationships with foreign states, Trump violates the compact between the states and the federal government.

The state attorneys general have indicated that discovery in the case would likely consist of six months of interviews with potential witnesses, as well as obtaining records and information on how DC’s Trump International Hotel has helped Trump financially as president.

The state attorneys general cited a separate case over the government’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census in an attempt to head off Trump’s appeal and have the judge allow discovery to begin before the appeal court can weigh in.

In that case, discovery continued in spite of a pending appeal before the Supreme Court.

“If the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari is not a sufficient basis on which to stay active litigation, then surely Defendant’s suggestion that he might file a mandamus petition is no reason to stay discovery, particularly when discovery will be primarily focused on third parties,” the state attorneys general wrote.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Good luck with that gambit, orange legal team.

  2. Avatar for dweb dweb says:

    NOTE: The ongoing effort to delay court review of the administration (Wilbur Ross) attempt to add a citizenship question to the census questionnaire for 2020 is the same tactic used repeatedly by the GOP in gerrymandering cases.

    Take NC as a prime example…the courts have FOUR TIMES now ruled that the Congressional district maps drawn by the GOP controlled legislature violate the law and have ordered them to draw replacements. Each time the GOP responds with replacements that are defiantly similarly flawed in their favor and then engage in protracted legal battles that enable them to keep using the bad maps while a solution is sought. This last time around, they were able to protract the battle long enough that the courts were forced to hold the 2018 mid terms using the latest flawed maps because “there was not enough time to order new ones without confusing the voters.” For the GOP…that is a victory.

    The long term solution and one steadily gaining ground nationwide (with recent referendum wins in MI, CO, Missouri and UT) is formation of independent commissions to handle the task of drawing these maps instead of biased political leaders in state legislators. Here in PA, the State Supreme Court had to redraw its own maps for Congressional districts when the GOP failed to produce a version that didn’t repeat the violations that caused the Court to step in. The end result…the new PA Congressional delegation is now 9-9. It was 13-5 GOP. The struggle to change the state’s system for drawing state House and Senate districts continues, but requires a Constitutional amendment. That makes it a very heavy lift, but the battle goes on, with 64% of Pennsylvanian’s in favor of reform, backed by nearly 60,000 statewide petition signatures and growing. Dem. Governor Tom Wolf has formed a Redistricting Commission to study the issue and make recommendations. The GOP leadership (OMG) immediately attacked the move and said it was unnecessary.

  3. So.Much.Obstruction.

  4. “Obstruction of Justice, Incorporated,” a wholly owned subsidiary of The Trump Organization

Continue the discussion at

102 more replies


Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for ajoguy Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for cervantes Avatar for dweb Avatar for theod Avatar for mickeyg Avatar for dont Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for nemo Avatar for benthere Avatar for tena Avatar for ozziecat Avatar for erratum Avatar for canadachris Avatar for treefrog Avatar for nycabj Avatar for katscherger Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for edys Avatar for zillacop Avatar for kenga

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: