Trump Demands Chance To Review His Files Seized In Raids On Michael Cohen

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 27: U.S. President Donald Trump listens while meeting with women small business owners in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 27, 2017 in Washington, D.C. Investors on Monday furth... WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 27: U.S. President Donald Trump listens while meeting with women small business owners in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 27, 2017 in Washington, D.C. Investors on Monday further unwound trades initiated in November resting on the idea that the election of Trump and a Republican Congress meant smooth passage of an agenda that featured business-friendly tax cuts and regulatory changes. (Photo by Andrew Harrer-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Donald Trump is demanding the chance to review his files seized by federal investigators from his longtime fixer, Michael Cohen, to assess which are protected by attorney-client privilege, arguing that DOJ prosecutors cannot fairly make that determination.

Trump’s demands came in a letter filed late Sunday evening in federal court in Manhattan, where U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood has scheduled a hearing Monday to determine who gets to go through the seized records first. Prosecutors have said that a federal grand jury has been investigating Cohen for months. He has not been charged with any crimes.

Trump’s lawyers asked that he and Cohen receive a copy of the materials obtained in last week’s raids so they can give them a first pass for exchanges that may be privileged. A so-called “taint team” of DOJ attorneys uninvolved in the case would be “plainly inadequate” and fail to “zealously protect the President’s privilege,” Trump attorney Joanna Hendon wrote in the letter addressed to Wood.

The President retained this new legal team after federal agents raided Cohen’s office, home and apartment last Monday. Court filings released days later revealed that Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney and close ally, has been under criminal investigation for matters related to his business dealings.

Lawyers for Trump and Cohen have taken similar tacks, arguing that the U.S. Attorney’s Office is trying to rush the investigation and made their seizures in an inappropriate fashion.

In her Sunday letter, Hendon said that agents acted in an “aggressive, intrusive, and unorthodox manner” during the raid and that their actions were “disquieting to lawyers, clients, citizens, and commentators alike.”

She argued that U.S. prosecutors had made clear in their filings before the court that they’ve “pre-judged the matter of privilege” by insisting that few of the documents seized were likely to warrant that protection, and that the “staggering amount of attention trained on this investigation, Mr. Cohen, and the President” make it impossible for them to review the material fairly.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office has asked Wood for permission to begin reviewing the material immediately, noting that the use of taint teams is “common procedure” in federal investigations.

Wood is expected to decide who gets first crack at the documents at a hearing Monday at 2 p.m. ET in federal court in lower Manhattan. Cohen has been ordered to appear in person.

Read the full letter below:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Kimba - please hear my prayers and smote these phillistines.

  2. Avatar for marby marby says:

    For the lawyers here at TPM - is there any credibility to this argument? (Regardless, I’m smiling because this indicates how worried they must be about what’s in those Cohen docs)

  3. Who the fuck are these dumbasses, and what the fuck do they think they’re doing writing letters to the judge instead of, oh, I don’t know, some kind of actual brief supporting some kind of actual motion?

    Jesus. Where are they finding these numbnuts?

  4. Your honor, we strenuously object…

  5. So if a warrant is served on a known drug dealer, documents can’t be seized to prove the individual is a dealer?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

204 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for ghost Avatar for jjwhack Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for blandsten Avatar for inversion Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for prefabfan Avatar for dickweed Avatar for darrtown Avatar for demyankee Avatar for tiowally Avatar for machoneman Avatar for judygran Avatar for katscherger Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for eskimo Avatar for jstrummer Avatar for texastoast Avatar for justruss Avatar for atldrew

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: