TIMELINE: What’s Known About Trump Dossier’s Creation And Dissemination

Trump dossier. Christopher Steele, the former MI6 agent who set-up Orbis Business Intelligence and compiled a dossier on Donald Trump, in London where he has spoken to the media for the first time. Picture date: Tues... Trump dossier. Christopher Steele, the former MI6 agent who set-up Orbis Business Intelligence and compiled a dossier on Donald Trump, in London where he has spoken to the media for the first time. Picture date: Tuesday March 7, 2017. See PA story POLITICS Trump. Photo credit should read: Victoria Jones/PA Wire URN:30440494 MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Thanks to the Washington Post’s Tuesday night scoop that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee had funded the opposition research project that gave rise to the so-called Trump dossier, a major question has been answered about the origins and evolution of the document, which has been a focal point of Russia-2016 investigation.

Through that new report, other reporting, and the litigation now surrounding the dossier, we are getting a clearer a picture of how the dossier came to be, to whom it was disseminated and when top national security officials thought it was valuable enough to make then-President Obama and President-elect Trump aware of it.

President Trump and his allies have vehemently denied its claims — some of them salacious — of collusion between his campaign and Russia figures to meddle with the election. They have used the news of its DNC-Clinton campaign funding to smear it (though the project was initially funded by an unknown GOP donor). Yet federal investigators found its sourcing reliable enough to begin checking out its claims themselves.

The most colorful of its allegations have yet to be verified. But other more general claims made in the dossier about Russia’s efforts to interfere with the election have indeed panned out.

The dossier, first published by Buzzfeed in early January, has been the target of numerous lawsuits. A Russia tech exec named in the document has sued Buzzfeed here in the U.S., while mounting a parallel lawsuit in the U.K. against Christopher Steele (pictured above), the ex-British spy who assembled it. Fusion GPS, the private research firm that hired Steele for the oppo project has also faced legal actions, both in private lawsuits and from congressional investigators, for more information on the dossier.

There are still other big questions to be answered, like the identity of the GOP donor who first started the research project. But here is a timeline of what we know so far:

September 2015: A still unknown Republican donor who opposed Donald Trump hires Fusion GPS to research the candidate, according to the New York Times.

April 2016: After it becomes clear that Trump will be the GOP nominee, the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign take over the funding of the research project, through the intermediary of Democratic power attorney Marc Elias’ law firm Perkins Coie, according to the Washington Post.

June 2016: Steele’s company Orbis is hired by Fusion GPS for the project, per his court filings in a British lawsuit against him. He goes on to produce 16 versions of the dossier before November’s election, according to his court filings.

Summer 2016: FBI begins investigation into Trump associates’ alleged Russia ties.

“Near the start of July” 2016: Steele sends “a report he had written for that firm to a contact at the FBI,” according to an account of his research by Mother Jones’ David Corn.

End of September 2016: Journalists from New York Times, the Washington Post, Yahoo News, the New Yorker and CNN are verbally briefed in-person by Steele and Fusion GPS on some of his findings, per a filing in the U.K. lawsuit.

Mid-October: New York Times, Washington Post and Yahoo News journalists verbally briefed in-person.

October 2016: Last of the 16 pre-election memos is produced, according court docs in British case.

Late October 2016: Mother Jones reporter briefed by Steele via Skype, according to court documents.

End of October 2016:  Democrats end their funding for Fusion GPS, according to the Washington Post.

October 30, 2016: Then-Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) writes letter to then-FBI Director James Comey in which he says that in their conversations and in conversations with other top national security officials, it had “become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government.” A former Reid spokesman would go on to Tweet, after the dossier became public, that dossier was what Reid was referring to when he wrote the letter.

October 31, 2016: Mother Jones’ David Corn publishes his major scoop on the dossier, presumably based on his conversations with Steele: “A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump.” In it, he says that a “former senior intelligence officer for a Western country” had told MoJo that it had provided the FBI “with memos, based on his recent interactions with Russian sources, contending the Russian government has for years tried to co-opt and assist Trump—and that the FBI requested more information from him.” The timeline offered by Corn in the story matches what has since been presented in court documents. Corn also writes that the ex-spy’s work was for an oppo project originally financed by a GOP client, but that the funding was taken over by a “client allied with Democrats” before the former spy was retained to work on it.

After November 8, 2016 election: The FBI agrees to pay Steele to continue his work on Russia-Trump ties, but then pulls out of the deal because the scrutiny that would grow around him and the document.

November 18, 2016: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) attends the annual Halifax International Security Forum in Nova Scotia, where Andrew Wood, a former British ambassador to Russia, told McCain about the existence of material compromising to Donald Trump, according to Wood’s account to BBC4. Wood, an Orbis “associate,” goes on to set up a meeting between Steele and David Kramer, an associate of McCain’s who works at the McCain Institute, according to court filings in the U.K. case.

November 28: Steele meets with Kramer and tells him that what he’s learned through his research raises nation security issues. They agree that a hard copy of the research should be provided to McCain, per court filings.

Around December 13, 2017: Another version of the dossier is compiled, and it is shared with an unnamed U.K. security official and with Fusion, according to Steele’s filings in the U.K. case. According to the filings, Fusion was instructed to only provide the memo to Kramer, for him to pass on to McCain. Fusion has in court filings denied giving the memo directly to Buzzfeed.

Also around this time — December 9, according to CNN’s reporting, though that doesn’t entirely match up with the timeline laid out in the Steele lawsuit — McCain hands over a copy to Comey. The FBI, however, already had in its possession earlier versions of the memo dating up to August.

Late 2016: Buzzfeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith suggests to investigative reporter Ken Bensinger that he reach out to an unnamed “source,” per a Buzzfeed filing. The source shows Bensinger a copy of the dossier and allows him to photograph it.

January 6: Comey and other top national security officials brief President-elect Donald Trump on the dossier, using a two-page summary, at a meeting in Trump Tower, as first reported by CNN and later confirmed by Comey in Senate testimony. Then-President Obama and leaders in Congress were also briefed on the dossier.

January 10, 2017: CNN publishes its report on the briefing Trump and Obama received on the dossier, adding that U.S. national security officials had been examining Steele’s work and had found some of his sources credible enough to include in the presentation, even as many of the dossier’s claims are unverified. Buzzfeed later that day publishes the dossier in its entirety.

October 24, 2017: After a number of attempts, via lawsuits or otherwise, to get Fusion GPS to release the identity of its clients of the dossier project, the Washington Post reports that the Democrats funding it were the DNC and the Clinton campaign. Its report is partially based on a letter Elias sent to Fusion GPS that day releasing the firm from its client confidentiality agreement, as the House Intel Committee sought to subpoena the firm’s banking information.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. I just don’t understand why this is even news. Of course the DNC and HRC had a hand in funding this. Opposition research.

    And to call this “collusion with the Russians” is patently and on it’s face absurd. THERE ARE NO RUSSIANS INVOLVED IN THE PRODUCTION OF THIS DOSSIER! That’s like saying that a detective is “colluding” with a murderer because she took the time to interview people who have knowledge of the crime.

    I call bullshit on Maggie Haberman and the whole crew.

  2. Avatar for lew lew says:

    Thank God Almighty we know now about this. I have no doubt that congressMAN Gowdy we get right to the bottoms of this just like he did with Benghazi! And we will soon learn that how wrong the washingtonpost is, most of the time, but can be right occasionally, and that our greatest president, our hugely greatest president is not to BLAME for his many russian contacts, and those of Paul Manafort and all those other INNOCENTS in his cabinet. How dare those liberal bloodsucking commie pinko darkies conduct oppo research on the the GREATEST human being on the planet.

  3. How Republicans Are Jumping on the New Steele Scoop to Distract From the Trump-Russia Scandal: Meanwhile, they are promoting a counter-controversy of dubious origins.

  4. Wonder when that “unknown Republican donor” will step forward, now that the DC media has got a dump in their diapers over the HRC campaign and the DNC picking up the tab of normal every day oppo research that showed Trump to be exactly who he is, a disgusting man-child owned by the Russians and in debt up to his shitty implants.

  5. Bullshit is Maggie Haberman’s middle name.

    She’s working hard to be less credible than Judith Fucking Miller.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

59 more replies


Avatar for system1 Avatar for publishermike Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for jackster Avatar for mymy Avatar for leftflank Avatar for rick_b Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for mickeyg Avatar for inversion Avatar for dont Avatar for sniffit Avatar for noparty Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for tomanjeri Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for topchap Avatar for bd2999 Avatar for junebug Avatar for johniwaniszek Avatar for tsp Avatar for dcd

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: