The Mystery Of Jerome Corsi’s Joint Defense Agreement With Donald Trump

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Noted conspiracy monger Jerome Corsi claims to continue to be in cahoots with President Donald Trump, offering a new, potentially dubious account of a non-written joint defense agreement with the president’s legal team.

But according to legal experts, any joint defense agreement not put down to paper would be highly problematic at best and, in the words of one former federal prosecutor, “malpractice” at worst.

Since going public last week with a draft plea agreement from special counsel Robert Mueller, Corsi has claimed that Trump attorney Jay Sekulow took care to make sure that a joint defense agreement between the two parties was never put down to paper, and remained oral.

In an interview Monday with TPM, Corsi said that Aaron Zelinsky, a prosecutor on Mueller’s team, first approached his lawyer about the existence of a joint defense agreement with Trump.

“Zelinsky got word that we had this agreement with Jay Sekulow,” he said, recounting a supposed phone call between Zelinsky and his attorney, David Gray.

“I said wait a minute, call Zelinsky, but I don’t want Zelinsky misled – I want Zelinsky to understand that we’re acting as if we had this formal agreement in place, but we don’t, we are acting as if that were in place,” Corsi said.

Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani confirmed the existence of the agreement last week, but didn’t specify whether it was committed to paper.

In the TPM interview, Corsi suggested that his coordination with the White House continues. He said that he had directed his new attorney Larry Klayman (who once called for a coup against Obama) to give a copy of a so-called “complaint” against Mueller to Trump’s legal team in advance.

But attorneys that TPM spoke with said that it’s extremely unlikely that an “informal” joint defense agreement could serve to provide Corsi and Trump with the kind of protections a joint defense agreement is mean to establish or even exist at all.

“It’s an uphill battle to say that we had an agreement but we never reduced it to writing,” said Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor at Lowenstein Sandler. “The question is, ‘What are you trying to hide here?”

Honig added that joint defense agreements are very common in “multi-defendant cases, because they enable multiple defendants to share confidences with each other without waiving privilege.”

The former prosecutor added that while he had encountered cases involving non-written defense agreements, they mostly came from situations where there was not enough time or some obstacle to putting an agreement down in writing.

Jeffrey Cramer, another former federal prosecutor, told TPM that “if there’s not a written agreement here, it wouldn’t matter if Corsi at least told the other defendants that he’s not cooperating, if he’s playing both ends, it’s gonna get messy.”

Corsi added to TPM that his supposed agreement was “one-way,” denying that he is putting on an elaborate performance in the media and through his attorneys to convince Trump to issue him a pardon.

“You and the special counsel are entitled to whatever opinion you want,” Corsi said, upon being asked whether he is angling for a pardon. “I think I’m doing this because of my integrity.”

Gene Rossi, a former federal prosecutor at Carlton Fields law firm, said “there’s no such thing as an informal defense agreement.”

“If it’s an informal defense agreement, then Giuliani is just blowing smoke,” he added. “The attorney for the President of the United States has an informal unwritten defense agreement with Corsi?”

“That’s malpractice.”

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Immediately subpoena Corsi, all of his attorneys, and all of Trump’s attorneys and ask them every question you can think of about what was said between them. This is monumentally stupid.

  2. Avatar for jmacaz jmacaz says:

    Without right-wing idiots to buy what he peddles Corsi is just another POS republican

  3. “The question is, ‘What are you trying to hide here?”

    Kinda says it all

  4. Your Honor, I acted with the understanding that we had an agreement we didn’t have.

    So I took my neighbor’s car.

  5. “That’s malpractice.”

    The word I was thinking is “bullshit”. If this is a stalling tactic it’s worth a day or two. As a defence it’s worth about as much as a paper mache bag.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

92 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for fess Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for cmmtchll Avatar for cervantes Avatar for theod Avatar for lastroth Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for go2goal Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for careysub Avatar for thomasmatthew Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for mjonesmel Avatar for tena Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for tsp Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for greysea Avatar for katscherger Avatar for socalista Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for hallowseve31

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: