Texas Says It Will Appeal Ruling Weakening Its Voter ID Law To SCOTUS

FILE - In this Feb. 26, 2014 file photo, an election official checks a voter's photo identification at an early voting polling site in Austin, Texas. A majority of the nation's highest court on Saturday Oct. 18, 2014... FILE - In this Feb. 26, 2014 file photo, an election official checks a voter's photo identification at an early voting polling site in Austin, Texas. A majority of the nation's highest court on Saturday Oct. 18, 2014 rejected an emergency request from the Justice Department and civil rights groups to prohibit the state from requiring voters to produce certain forms of photo identification in order to cast ballots. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Texas has decided that it will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review a major appeals court ruling against its voter ID law.

“To protect the integrity of voting in the State of Texas, our office will appeal the Voter ID ruling of the Fifth Circuit to the United States Supreme Court,” Marc Rylander, a spokesman for state Attorney General Ken Paxton, said in a statement Tuesday.

The decision, initially reported by the Dallas Morning News, comes after the state agreed to soften its law for November’s elections. A spokesperson for Paxton’s office declined to comment to TPM on when the appeal would be would filed, and did not respond to a question about whether Paxton’s office would ask the Supreme Court to put the law back in place for November’s election.

The full Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in July that Texas’ 2011 voter ID law had the effect of discriminating against minority voters. The court sent the case back down to the district court level in order for the state and its challengers to hash out a remedy for November’s election. A district court judge last week approved an agreement in which voters who did not have the photo IDs required by the law would be able to vote, if they showed certain other forms of ID and signed an declaration saying they faced a reasonable impediment to attaining the required IDs.

At the time of the agreement, Paxton’s office had suggested the state was still weighing a Supreme Court appeal and characterized the agreement as just an “interim remedy.”

Latest Muckraker
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: