Texas’ Bogus Noncitizen Voter List Included Naturalized Elections Staffer

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton holds a joint press conference Feb. 18, 2015 with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, l, to address a Texas federal court's decision on the lawsuit filed by 26 states challenging President Obama... Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton holds a joint press conference Feb. 18, 2015 with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, l, to address a Texas federal court's decision on the lawsuit filed by 26 states challenging President Obama's executive action on immigration. Paxton was indicted Aug. 3, 2015 on three counts of securities fraud not related to his official duties. (Photo by Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Texas’ list of suspected noncitizen voters was so sloppy that among the people it flagged was an El Paso County elections staffer, whose naturalization party the county’s elections administrator recalled attending a couple of years ago.

The staffer’s presence on the list — which Texas Republicans and President Trump have baselessly touted as showing tens of thousands of noncitizen voters — was highlighted in a lawsuit filed Monday alleging that state elections officials violated the constitution and the Voting Rights Act.

The error was also reported by the Texas Tribune, where El Paso County Election Administrator Lisa Wise said she spotted the staffer’s name on the list of 4,152 names provided to her by the state.

“We had a naturalization party for her,” Wise told the Tribune, which reported the staffer was naturalized in 2017. “She had gone and gotten her driver’s license, I think, four years ago.”

Local election officials in Texas have been scrambling since Texas Secretary of State David Whitley put out on advisory on Jan. 25 indicating that the state —  by comparing voter registration records to the records kept by Texas Department of Public Safety, which issues driver’s licenses and other IDs — had found 95,000 potential noncitizens on the voter rolls, 58,000 having cast a ballot in the last 22 years of elections.

Civil rights advocates and election policy wonks quickly noted that such an approach is ripe for false positives, particularly among naturalized citizens who may have applied for a driver’s license before their naturalization.

Nonetheless, the secretary of state instructed local officials to vet the list themselves by sending notices to suspected noncitizen voters requiring they show proof of citizenship. Those who don’t respond to the notice within 30 days can then be removed from the voter rolls, under the secretary of state’s guidance.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton tweeted the numbers, as did President Trump, who further mischaracterized what the state had actually found.

Since then, the list has been found to be riddled with hundreds of duplicates and thousands of citizens. Monday’s lawsuit, filed by several voting rights organizations, is at least the second lawsuit the state is facing for how it handled the allegations.

The lawsuit accuses Texas of treating naturalized citizens as second class citizens and of imposing on them a discriminatory burden by forcing them to show proof of citizenship at the risk of their voter registrations being purged.

Read the lawsuit:

Latest Muckraker
70
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for yskov yskov says:

    Ironically, this would be something like reason number 137 for that corrupt bastard.

  2. Avatar for yskov yskov says:

    Nonetheless, the secretary of state instructed local officials to vet the list themselves by sending notices to suspected noncitizen voters requiring they show proof of citizenship. Those who don’t respond to the notice within 30 days can then be removed from the voter rolls, under the secretary of state’s guidance.

    He’s probably very proud of himself for finding another way to cage and purge what is presumably a particularly Democratic-leaning segment there, more-or-less recently naturalized citizens.

    I can’t see how this would survive Supreme Court scrutiny under the Voting Rights Act…

    Oh.

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    Sure is a good thing voting isn’t explicitly recognized as a constitutional right, or else some folks might be looking at some long federal time.

  4. Embarrassment? Embarrassment! No, Fake News is the Embarrassment!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

64 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jep07 Avatar for doctorbiobrain Avatar for yskov Avatar for arrendis Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for lastroth Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for moderately_disgusted Avatar for dickweed Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for travelingprincess Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for tpr Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for justruss Avatar for zlj2011 Avatar for outis Avatar for kenfair Avatar for yellowbeard

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: