State IG: Trump Appointees Targeted Career Staff For ‘Deep State’ Disloyalty

The US Department of State building is seen in Washington, DC, on July 22, 2019. (Photo by Alastair Pike / AFP) (Photo credit should read ALASTAIR PIKE/AFP/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Top political appointees at the State Department “harassed” career staffers whom they suspected were members of the supposed “deep state” or were purportedly “disloyal” to the Trump administration’s goals, according to a new report from the department’s inspector general.

The report focuses on two political appointees in State’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs, which handles U.S. policy at the United Nations and other multinational bodies.

Assistant secretary Kevin Moley and senior adviser Mari Stull are named in the report as being behind much of the chaos. The report details multiple incidents in which Stull allegedly “retaliated” against State Department employees.

Stull, a former food lobbyist who blogged about wine under the moniker “vino vixen,” allegedly accused career diplomats of belonging to the “Deep State” and of “undermining the President’s agenda.” The report cites Moley as saying that Stull was joking.

Career employees told the IG that Stull referred to them as “Obama holdovers,” “traitors,” or “disloyal” at other points, focusing on allegations that she retaliated against federal workers for their personal political beliefs.

At the same time, Stull allegedly favored employees who had contributed to Republican candidates, though the IG found no evidence that the Trump appointee took any action based on campaign contributions.

“The mere discussion of them raises significant concerns as to whether Ms. Stull was engaging in political activity while on duty,” the report reads.

At another point, Stull allegedly grew annoyed at a bureau employee for escorting a delegation from the Congressional Black Caucus to the UN, because only Democratic members of Congress were present in the group.

“Ms. Stull accused the employee of trying to ‘thwart’ President Trump and undermine his agenda,” the document reads. “After the trip, many of the employee’s job responsibilities were taken away.”

The report alleges that Moley failed to prevent Stull from retaliating against employees for their supposed political beliefs. During his tenure, the report states, 50 out of 300 of the bureau’s employees departed.

Reports about problems at the bureau reached the press in June 2018, via an article in Foreign Policy which reported that Stull had compiled a “loyalty list” of employees. The report doesn’t corroborate that allegation, but it does reference a June 2018 article that quoted Stull calling the Foreign Policy story “a hit piece written in consort with leakers who want to malign this President and anyone associated with the Administration.”

Stull declined the IG’s request for an interview. Instead, after the investigation began, she purportedly sent a letter to the watchdog raising questions about “fraud, waste and abuse, as well as allegations that she had herself experienced retaliation as a result of her efforts to address these concerns.”

The report states that Stull declined to offer additional information. She left the State Department in January 2019.

Moley is still in his position. In the report’s recommendations section, the IG advises State to develop an “action plan” on managing the section, and to consider “disciplinary action.”

State accepted the recommendation on developing an action plan, and acknowledged that Stull’s departure moots the point regarding discipline. But for Moley, State wrote that it had “counseled” him regarding his leadership, and that it would consider further steps based on how the watchdog assesses his responses to the report.

In an appendix to the report providing his responses, Moley said that the actions described by the IG do not “represent the person I am or have ever been.”

Read the report here:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Well, DUH!

  2. The Civil Servants are supposed to be protected from political appointees bs. So when does that start to happen, and what are the mechanisms that need to be employed to make it so. And that applies to every facet of the Executive Branch.

  3. Slippery slope

    Remember: we have to save ourselves. There is no country 10X more powerful and capable than we are who is going to “invade” and stop these people.

    This is where the BothSiderists have to decide that they have made enough money.

  4. Avatar for byteme byteme says:

    Moley said that the actions described by the IG do not “represent the person I am or have ever been.”

    I’d say that his actions accurately represented the douchebag he is.

  5. …Stull had compiled a “loyalty list” of employees.

    “Loyalty list”/‘enemies list,’ potaito/potahto – we’re clearly in the realm of abuse of power.
    Drumpf’s involvement in Israel’s barring Tlaib and Omar’s visit is of the same kind.
    Nixon was impeached for it and his tools were removed from the government. I can’t see any reason the same standards shouldn’t apply here.

Continue the discussion at

66 more replies


Avatar for paulw Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for inversion Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for lastroth Avatar for martinstett Avatar for kitty Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for benthere Avatar for pshah Avatar for noonm Avatar for tiowally Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for drtv Avatar for zeusspeaks Avatar for skeptical Avatar for csurz420 Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: