Facebook general counsel Colin Stretch’s week did not improve on Wednesday.
Fresh off a hiding Tuesday from Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), Stretch appeared before the Senate Intelligence Committee, where Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) read the social media executive the riot act for what he called a refusal to take the problem of foreign interference in elections seriously.
“In meetings with your leadership as you became more aware of this problem, you aggressively promoted the fact that you took down 30,000 accounts around the French elections,” Warner told Stretch. “Now you say not all of those were Russian related. Have you gone back and cross checked those accounts you took down in France to see if they were active in the American election?”
Stretch tried to give a discursive answer, but Warner cut him off. “The accounts related to Russian accounts that you took down, your leadership bragged about how proactive you were in the French election process,” Warner said, “did you check those accounts to see if any of them were active in the American elections?”
Stretch tried for a second non-answer, which appeared to anger Warner. “Just please answer my question,” he said. “Have you reviewed the accounts you took down in France that were Russian related to see if they played any role in the American election?”
Stretch said he was “trying to answer the question.”
“The answer is yes or no,” snapped Warner. Facebook, he said, had looked at the 470 American accounts identified for payment in rubles. Had it applied the same techniques to the accounts seeking to interfere in the European elections “to see if those accounts were active in the United States?”
“I will have to come back to you on that, senator,” Stretch said.
Warner was irate. “Sir, we had this hearing scheduled for months,” he said. “I find your answer very disappointing. On the question of we just discovered you had 80,000 views in terms of Russian views on Facebook. We discover in the last 48 hours 120,000 Russian-based posts on Instagram. Have you done any similar analysis on those 120,000 posts? Know the 80,000 reached 126 million Americans. Have you done the same analysis on the 120,000 posts on Instagram?”
Stretch answered that Facebook had indeed analyzed those posts.
“How many Americans did those touch?” Warner asked.
Far more than Facebook had initially admitted, it turned out. “The data on Instagram is not as complete, but the data we have indicates that beginning in October of 2016, those Instagram posts reached an additional 16 million people in addition to the 126 million people that we identify,” Stretch said.
“Now we’re seeing the Russian activity is roughly at 150 million Americans without knowing how many times they were reshared,” Warner said.
Alex Stamos, the company’s chief security officer, quickly issued a comment, which also did not answer the question of whether the accounts run in Germany and France were active in the American election. Stamos did say that “[a]ll of the accounts disabled automatically [in the sweep of European disinfo accounts] are still included in our searches for organized disinformation actors like the Internet Research Agency.”
Over the last year I’ve gotten a few requests to like a particular meme from some of the dimmer lights I’m friends with on Facebook. Surprise, surprise some of these are some of the rabble rousing pieces shared from Russian trolls. Of course these are the people who, if you disagree with them, tell you how informed they are and how you are a pawn of fake news.
Flash back to one year ago…
http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/7573465/mark-zuckerberg-rejects-crazy-idea-that-fake-news-on-facebook-swayed-voters
I think the idea that fake news on Facebook – of which it’s a very small amount of the content – influenced the election in any way is a pretty crazy idea," [Zuckerberg] said, adding, “there have been hoaxes on the internet before… We do our best to make it so that people can report that, and as I said before, we can show people the most meaningful content we can.”
You think Zuckerberg still wants to run for president?
He never did, he’s known his company was complicit (purposefully or through negligence) for a very long time, his “tour” around the country was an attempt to clean his name and the facebook brand.
From the lack of a straight answer in that exchange, and the lack of a straight answer in the follow up statement from Facebook, I’m going to go ahead and assume that the answer to Warner’s question is NO.
When you’re asked repeatedly whether you did the wrong thing or the right thing, and in response you dodge and deflect and obfuscate repeatedly, the overwhelming likelihood is that you did the wrong thing.
The bottom line is that Facebook was asleep at the switch…and is apparently still dozing.