Federal prosecutors in a letter to U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood Monday pushed back on President Trump’s request that he and his attorney Michael Cohen get the first opportunity, before Justice Department lawyers, to review documents seized in FBI raids on Cohen last week.
“[T]he President still cannot identify a single case in which a court has ordered such a remedy, and for good reason — the President’s proposal would set a dangerous precedent,” the letter, from the deputy U.S. attorney overseeing the investigation and three assistant U.S. attorneys in New York’s Southern District, said.
The letter was filed about two hours before a hearing scheduled in front of Wood on Cohen’s effort to halt the review of the seized records by what’s known as a “filter team” or a “taint team” — a group of DOJ lawyers not working on the investigation tasked with sorting out documents covered by attorney-client privilege. Trump — having retained a new personal attorney last week — has sought to intervene in the matter. In a letter Sunday night, his attorney proposed letting Cohen review the documents first, and having him provide for Trump copies of documents that “relate to him in any way.” Trump’s letter also rejected another proposal that had been floated by Cohen: bringing in an independent special master to sort out the privileged documents.
The federal prosecutors in their letter to Wood Monday, called Trump’s position “extreme” and said that under his theory, “every person who has communicated with a lawyer would be given the power to turn every search warrant into a subpoena and to demand the return of lawfully-seized evidence in order to undertake their own review of the evidence.”
“Such a rule is unworkable and ripe for abuse,” the assistant U.S. attorneys said.
Read their full letter below:
“A Trump Presidency is unworkable and ripe for abuse,” the assistant U.S. attorneys said.
FIFY
the President’s proposal would set a dangerous precedent,
Do you think…
PLEASE, let Trump’s team do their own sorting, but AFTER the NY Feds have copies of their own stacks compiled… just don’t TELL them its already done.
Then compare the two piles, is there any doubt the Trump stack that doesn’t match the Fed stack will be the smoking gun of all smoking guns?
They would only sequester what exposes or expresses their worst guilt.
Let em have at… just don’t tell them there’s already a stack made up by impartial investigators.
"“Such a rule is unworkable and ripe for abuse…”
Which is the whole idea here.
It’s too bad they can’t just use the email and phone warrant information and provide Cohen with a public list: “Which of these people is the client you’ve been asked not to disclose?”