Prosecutors Play Coy To Judge About Their Reversal On Flynn Trial Testimony

on December 1, 2017 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 01: Michael Flynn, former national security advisor to President Donald Trump, leaves following his plea hearing at the Prettyman Federal Courthouse December 1, 2017 in Washington, DC. Spec... WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 01: Michael Flynn, former national security advisor to President Donald Trump, leaves following his plea hearing at the Prettyman Federal Courthouse December 1, 2017 in Washington, DC. Special Counsel Robert Mueller charged Flynn with one count of making a false statement to the FBI. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

If prosecutors are rethinking their cooperation deal with former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn they’re keeping those cards close to their chest in a new filing with the judge overseeing Flynn’s case.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered prosecutors and Flynn to explain what was happening after it was revealed that prosecutors had backtracked on their plans to call on Flynn to testify in the upcoming trial of Flynn’s former business associate.

The documents highlighted a dispute between prosecutors and Flynn’s new legal team over Flynn’s testimony about the foreign lobbying project for Turkey he worked on with the associate, Bijan Rafiekian (who also goes by Bijan Kian).

The dispute also suggests Flynn’s relationship with prosecutors has grown tense since he brought in the new group of lawyers — among them, a prominent critic of special counsel Robert Mueller — to replace the original set of attorneys that negotiated the plea deal.

In their filing with Sullivan Wednesday, prosecutors said they couldn’t “speculate” how the unsealed records in the Rafiekian case could affect the “government’s sentencing position” in the Flynn proceeding in front of Sullivan.

“Although the records raise numerous issues, the Rafiekian trial may still impact the government’s position,” the prosecutors said. “For example, Rafiekian could call the defendant to testify at trial. As a result, the government intends to reassess its sentencing position at the conclusion of that trial.”

Their decision not to put Flynn on the stand did not change their position that Flynn’s sentencing could wait until after Rafiekian’s trial, the filing said.

The change in Flynn’s testimony plans in the Rafiekian’s case likely piqued Sullivan’s interest because, after a roller coaster of a hearing last December, Sullivan agreed to delay Flynn’s sentencing until after his cooperation in that case was completed.

Flynn was slated to be sentenced in December, but the sentencing memo his old attorneys filed enraged the judge by casting doubt on his guilty plea. Sullivan hinted Flynn could face prison time even though prosecutors weren’t asking for any. His lawyers successfully sought the delay so Flynn could receive the benefit of the cooperation he is offering in the Rafiekian case.

In a filing unsealed in the Rafiekian case Tuesday, Flynn’s new team of lawyers hit many of the similar notes of the December sentencing memo by criticizing some of the government’s tactics and by downplaying the seriousness of the conduct Flynn has already admitted. The current dispute is over whether Flynn knew at the time he filed foreign lobbying forms for his Turkey project that the forms were false. His new lawyers insist that he did not know they were false at the time he filed them and that that’s what he has consistently told investigators. The government, in one of the newly unsealed docs in the Rafiekian case, said it does “not necessarily agree with these characterizations.”

Flynn has been ordered to respond by Thursday to the filing with the prosecutors filed Sullivan.

Read the Justice Department’s new filing with Sullivan below:

Latest Muckraker
39
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Flynn’s lawyers are causing the prosecutors to stop cooperation with him and reevaluate whether their sentencing recommendation and whether he has complied with the deal. Are his lawyers representing Flynn or doing Trump’s bidding? I can’t tell. Did Flynn keep things from Mueller? Is Trump trying to keep Flynn in line and lure him with the promise of a pardon and then let him serve jail time during the 2020 election cycle? I think there’s more here than meets the eye.

  2. National Security Advisor Michael Flynn they’re keeping those cards close to their chest in a new filing with the judge overseeing Flynn’s case.

    They have been ordered by William Barr to sabotage the case, and they are trying to piss off the judge.That works better than a pardon.

  3. Translation: Flynn is not cooperating with us, and how much more jail time we’re going to ask for depends on whether he lies as a witness in support of the defendant in the upcoming trial.

  4. Flynn has seemed quite desperate to avoid even a day in jail, he won’t be content with a pardon down the road. His bribe has probably already been signed and is super-secret squirreled away so that the prosecutors and judge don’t catch wind of it.

  5. Best informed speculation I have seen, so far.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

33 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for eduardoinohio Avatar for DuckmanGR Avatar for sniffit Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for lastroth Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for katwillow Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for gharlane Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for fuashcroft Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for gargoyle

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: