Republicans Make Moves To Crush Gerrymandering Reform

TPM Illustration
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

With anti-gerrymandering efforts gaining steam, Republicans in some states are mobilizing to protect their ability to continue rigging election maps.

In late April, a Republican group backed by the Michigan Chamber of Commerce sued to keep a popular redistricting reform measure off the state’s November ballot. Arizona’s GOP-controlled legislature last week narrowly failed to pass a bill that would have given the party much more control over the map-drawing process. And Pennsylvania Republicans, who recently mulled impeaching a group of state judges who struck down their gerrymander, this week gutted reform legislation.

Following the 2010 Census, the GOP used its control of key redistricting battlegrounds to draw district lines that have given it a major advantage in elections this decade. In response, voters frustrated by recent elections’ skewed outcomes have launched grassroots movements to fix the process before the next round of legislative and congressional map-drawing gets underway in 2021.

The biggest battle, of course, is at the Supreme Court, which since last fall has heard two different challenges to partisan gerrymandering and could issue a major ruling on the issue in the coming months. And the GOP has joined the fight there, too: Among the groups that submitted briefs to the court arguing in favor of protecting lawmakers’ right to gerrymander are the Republican National Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee, and the Republican State Leadership Committee.

But it’s the state-level efforts that lately have taken center stage.

Late last month, a Republican-backed group, Citizens Protecting Michigan’s Constitution (CPMC), sued to block a proposed constitutional amendment that, if approved by voters, would create a 13-person independent redistricting commission to redraw political maps. The commission would be composed of four Democrats, four Republicans and five “non-affiliated,” independent members.

The suit argued that only a constitutional convention could make the change, and that petitions used to gather signatures had left off relevant details of the constitutional language to be changed. The state GOP has called the proposed amendment a “wolf in sheep’s clothing by the Democrats.”

“The voters were signed on to something that said this is a simple amendment, and it’s not — it’s a wholesale change,” CPMC spokesman Dave Doyle told TPM. “If they had gone ahead and told people this changes the authority of the executive, legislative, judicial branches, that might have been a different story.”

In Arizona, Republicans have for months been working to upend the state’s independent commission, which is seen as a national model for creating fair maps. The GOP-controlled legislature sought to revamp the commission with a ballot initiative that would increase the number of members from five to eight, give lawmakers more control over the pool of commissioners, and bar the practice of drawing districts with slight differences in population size, which experts say currently makes it easier to draw districts with non-white majorities.

Democrats and advocates for fair maps said the changes would allow Republicans to slip in more of their ideological allies, and could lead to less minority representation in the state legislature.

The bill easily passed the House last week. But it unexpectedly failed in the Senate by just two votes on Thursday before the legislature adjourned for the year, meaning it won’t be on the November ballot.

Then there’s Pennsylvania. The state Supreme Court ruled in January that the state’s Republican-drawn maps were unconstitutionally gerrymandered, and asked an independent expert to draw new ones. That led a group of GOP lawmakers to file impeachment resolutions against four of the Democratic justices.

Two subsequent bipartisan legislative efforts to take control out of Pennsylvania lawmakers’ hands and turn it over to an independent redistricting commission have been gutted by Republicans on a key legislative panel.

The panel’s chair, Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, said that some of his fellow Republicans who backed one of those measures were “browbeaten … by activists that are the arm of the League of Women Voters.”

More anti-reform efforts could be on the horizon. In Missouri, a reform measure just qualified for the ballot, and the signature-gathering deadline is drawing near in Utah.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. What else can you expect when the inmates are running the asylum?

  2. We need to stop all of this partisanship that gets involved in the congressional districts. Let a computer do the work, and let experts on both sides of the aisle review the program and input data… THEN let the chips fall where they may… Of course this will piss off both sides… what could be more fair than that. Auto-Redistrict is an existing open source program.

  3. Avatar for nemo nemo says:

    It will not end until Democrats have returned the favor for the next decade and the GOP, including its Supreme Court wing, realize that reform is in their interests. THe GOP has to be forced. Democrats must not chicken out in the name of some fantasy that we live in a functioning democracy.

  4. Republicans: Fighting for Their Right to Cheat…and Keep On Cheating.

  5. When your ideas suck you need to hack the vote.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

55 more replies

Participants

Avatar for buckguy Avatar for butlerknights Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for jep07 Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for dweb Avatar for patterman Avatar for becca656 Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for rickjones Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for asturcot Avatar for dnfree Avatar for pauldownard Avatar for iceape Avatar for aiddon Avatar for loss_mentality

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: