NC GOPer Supports Probe Into Alleged Fraud Scheme Linked To His Campaign

Mark Harris speaks to the media during a news conference in Matthews, N.C., Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018. Harris is leading Dan McCready for the 9th congressional district in a race that is still too close to call. (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)
FILE- In this Nov. 7, 2018, file photo Mark Harris speaks to the media during a news conference in Matthews, N.C. North Carolina election officials agreed Friday, Nov. 30, to hold a public hearing into alleged “num... FILE- In this Nov. 7, 2018, file photo Mark Harris speaks to the media during a news conference in Matthews, N.C. North Carolina election officials agreed Friday, Nov. 30, to hold a public hearing into alleged “numerous irregularities” and “concerted fraudulent activities” involving traditional mail-in absentee ballots in the 9th Congressional District, apparently in two rural counties. Republican Harris leads Democrat Dan McCready by 905 votes from nearly 283,000 cast in all or parts of eight south-central counties reaching from Charlotte to near Fayetteville. (AP Photo/Chuck Burton, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Mark Harris, the GOP House candidate whose campaign is tangled up in an absentee ballot fraud investigation in North Carolina, pledged cooperation with the probe, and said he’d support calling a new election — if the investigators turned up proof that the alleged fraud scheme determined the results of the election.

“If this investigation finds proof of illegal activity on either side, to such a level that it could have changed the outcome of the election, then I would whole heartedly support a new election to ensure all voters have confidence in the results,” Harris said, while denying knowledge of any wrongdoing.

The remarks, posted Friday in a video on Harris’ Twitter account, took a similar line to the one the North Carolina GOP took Thursday, after previously calling for Harris’ race to be certified immediately.

While under North Carolina law, state election officials could call a new election if it’s found that fraud or irregularities changed the outcome of the race, they are not required to find that the outcome of the race was changed by the illegal activity in order to call a new election.

One provision of the relevant statute says that the election board can take any necessary action steps “to assure that an election is determined without taint of fraud or corruption.”

Harris’ campaign is under scrutiny due an apparent absentee ballot operation run by a local operative, Leslie McCrae Dowless, who was hired as a contractor by the campaign’s top consulting firm. Both the campaign and the firm, Red Dome Group, have been subpoenaed by the North Carolina State Board of Elections, which is among those investigating the allegations. Dowless denied any wrongdoing to the Charlotte Observer.

The state board declined to certify Harris’ race — where he has an unofficial lead of 905 votes over Democrat Dan McCready — last Friday, and will hold a hearing by Dec. 21 on its investigation. The date of that hearing has not been announced.

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for theod theod says:

    One might fairly ask, why not simply disqualify the cheating side ® and declare the other side (D) with the most votes the Winner. Save the money for a do-over and punish the perps for Election Fraud. Easy peasy.

  2. Avatar for ghost ghost says:

    Translation: “the evidence of fraud is so overwhelming I can’t even hope to get away with the usual outraged denials. I hired the guy to do exactly what he did, and now I’m desperate to look like I’m shocked to learn it.”

  3. The new Congress, at least in the House, should refuse to seat this guy and anybody from a gerrymandered district. Let’s give the GOP some of their own medicine.

  4. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    The republicans are desperately trying to get ahead of this scandal, and to frame it so that their candidate “wins” unless there’s proof beyond a reasonable doubt of at least 907 fraudulent absentee ballots. (And they probably have a count from their contractor telling them the number, so they feel confident.) They’ll argue against counting any of the absentee ballots that were collected and destroyed by their agents, because asking people which way they voted would be “violating the privacy of the voting system” or some such manure.

    They don’t understand that if you try to set off a bomb in a public place you don’t just get to go about your business if no one is injured.

  5. Avatar for rptwiz rptwiz says:

    Here’s the right messaging:

    Republicans constantly charge Democrats with voter fraud just as an excuse to do it themselves.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

26 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for brainpicnic Avatar for theod Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for irasdad Avatar for lallen56 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for southerndem Avatar for gajake Avatar for thecaptain Avatar for edhedh Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for rptwiz Avatar for drtv Avatar for iceape Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for richrathga

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: