Manafort Trial Judge Declines To Release Jurors’ Names Over Threats

Photo by Getty Images/ SHAWN THEW
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

ALEXANDRIA, VA — The judge presiding over the federal bank and tax fraud case against Paul Manafort on Friday declined to release the names of the jurors serving in the trial.

Judge T.S. Ellis cited threats jurors have received over the course of the trial, which begun about three weeks ago.

“I don’t feel right” about releasing the names, Ellis said.

Ellis was responding to a lawyer representing several media organizations that are seeking to unseal records in the case — including the identities of the jurors, transcripts of bench conferences between lawyers and the judge and a third category that is under seal because it relates to an ongoing investigation. Ellis did not specify the nature of the investigation.

Matthew Kelley, the lawyer representing the news organizations, argued in a hearing on the sealed records that there should be a presumption of openness when it comes to the names of the jurors. Kelley said there had not been any specific threats against the jurors, to which Ellis shot back, “I can tell you there have.”

Ellis added that he has also received threats, and is traveling with a U.S. marshall out of fear for his personal safety.

While the judge expressed sympathy with the media organizations’ desire for records to be available to the public, Ellis said if the court releases the names of the jurors, it could preclude people from participating in future “cases with notoriety.”

Manafort was in the courtroom during the hearing.

The jury continued to deliberate for a second day Friday. Late Thursday, the jury sought clarification on several issues related to the charges against Manafort.

Manafort has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

 

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. I think it is his call and if there have been threats I don’t think it is a bad decision.

  2. It’s probably the correct ruling. But everything this Judge does is suspect.

  3. We’ve never heard anything about any such threats before today. Perhaps that’s what some of the secret discussions have been about. I’m ok with not releasing juror names.

    But FWIW, I also have a tinge of suspicion that the Judge just can’t help glom for the cameras/media and is positioning himself to get more attention.

  4. Indeed. Releasing the names would result in a frenzy of Facebook and Twitter mining, hoping to find the political views of the jurors. And threats of course. And they would inevitably get the wrong person with a same name and harass them…

  5. Absolutely agree he shouldn’t. If the individual chooses, they can do so on their own.

    If Trump and his minions can affect prominent national security folks, imagine what they would do to a juror, given the chance.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

87 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sooner Avatar for jep07 Avatar for jackster Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for cervantes Avatar for faeyin Avatar for becca656 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for mcstubbins Avatar for southerndem Avatar for machopicasso Avatar for tsp Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for judygran Avatar for timbo Avatar for katscherger Avatar for qwerty23 Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for moderately Avatar for talbotic Avatar for wilecoyote Avatar for dicktater

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: