BREAKING: Manafort Pleads Guilty And Agrees To Cooperate With Mueller Probe

TPM Illustration/Getty Images
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In a dramatic reversal, former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort pleaded guilty Friday morning to federal criminal charges and agreed to cooperate with special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe.

Manafort’s decision to cooperate with Mueller is a potentially grievous blow to President Donald J. Trump, who had supported Manafort loudly and publicly, even as he also tried to distance himself from his onetime campaign manager’s Ukraine work.

The recent revelation by Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani that Trump and Manafort had a joint defense agreement further suggested that the legal and political fate of the President was inextricably tied to Manafort, the once high-flying GOP operative who made millions representing the pro-Russia regime in Ukraine.

Manafort arrived in the courtroom a few minutes past 11 a.m. ET on Friday, dressed in a dark suit and pink tie. He appeared calm and expressionless for most of his time in the courtroom, as he typically did throughout his weekslong trial in Virginia. Present in the courtroom as usual were his wife, one of her close friends, and his spokesman, Jason Maloni.

Prosecutors in the DC case against Manafort filed a Superseding Criminal Information on Friday morning in the Washington D.C. case, charging Manafort with a single count of conspiracy against the United States and a single count of conspiracy to obstruct justice through witness tampering, both arising from his work in Ukraine.

As a potential witness to alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 campaign, Manafort became an early and sustained focus of the Mueller probe. Manafort had insisted on his innocence and fought the criminal charges relentlessly, even after many of his assets were frozen by the government, the legal bills began piling up, and his top protege flipped and testified against him

The pressure on Manafort only grew after he was convicted last month in a Virginia trial on bank fraud and tax fraud charges brought by Mueller. Manafort’s plea agreement comes just days before a second jury trial was scheduled to start in D.C., where he was charged with money laundering, witness tampering and failure to disclose foreign lobbying. The criminal charges against Manafort did not directly pertain to Russia meddling in the 2016 election or to collusion with the Trump campaign.

The reported deal comes after a number of reports of their ongoing discussions in recent days. Manafort and Mueller had also been in plea talks while the jury was in deliberations during his Virginia trial, but those negotiations had fallen through.

The jury in the Virginia trial had found Manafort guilty on eight of the counts brought by Mueller, while dead-locking on 10 others. In the D.C. case, Manafort was facing a judge less sympathetic than the judge who presided over the Virginia trial, U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis.

The deal is the culmination of a federal investigation that has kept Manafort’s name in the headlines for more than a year, from summer 2017, when the FBI raided his residence in Virginia, through last October, when the charges first dropped, and into February, when his former business deputy and co-defendant Rick Gates reached his own plea deal with Mueller.

Manafort joined the Trump campaign in late March of 2016, and ascended to chairman before leaving in August as revelations emerged about his previous consulting work in the Ukraine.

Most of the charges Mueller brought against him stemmed from that pre-2016 Ukraine work, however some of the bank fraud allegations  in Virginia overlapped with Manafort’s time on the campaign and after.

The D.C. trial that was averted by the new plea deal stood to pull back the curtain on the world of covert lobbying on behalf of foreign powers in the nation’s capital. Top lobbyists of both parties were implicated in the case, as was a major law firm. Manafort was lobbying on behalf of a pro-Russian party in Ukraine, the Party of Regions, and was credited of resuscitating the career of its leader, Viktor Yanukovych, who won the presidency in 2010. Yanukovych was ousted from the country in 2014, and Manafort’s consulting work in Ukraine dried up, according to evidence presented by the prosecutors in the Virginia trial.

Manafort has been in jail since June, when the judge in the D.C. case, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, threw him in pretrial detention for alleged witness tampering.

Latest Muckraker
285
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for j.dave j.dave says:

    A conspracy to obstruct justice through witness tampering requires co-conspirators.

    Maybe even unindicted co-conspirators.

    Maybe even unindicted co-conspirators with joint defense agreements.

    Which have “co-conspirator” written all over them.

    Can’t wait for Mueller’s next move.

  2. Avatar for meri meri says:

    I’ll celebrate when some real time is handed down and some more indictments are aimed upwards.

    I wonder if Papa will have finished his sentence before Manafort starts his?

  3. This, the NYT op ed, less than 60 days to the midterm, tell all books, a Michael Moore film coming and a little Florence thrown in for good measure.

    David Bowie’s Under Pressure is playing in my head right now

  4. Avatar for jim195 jim195 says:

    Donnie, I beg your pardon.
    I wonder if there might be some state charges that could be spun out of this. I imagine witness tampering is a crime under DC law.

  5. Avatar for erik_t erik_t says:

    Popehat has thoughts on the superseding information:

    I know y’all are used to be saying “no, this is typical, it happens all the time,” but I’ve never seen anything like that Manafort superseding information – the charging instrument he’ll plead to.
    .
    Review: in federal court if you’re charged with a felony you have a right to be indicted by grand jury. An “information” is a charging instrument used when (a) it’s a minor crime for which indictment isn’t required or (b) you’re going to waive indictment and plead guilty.
    .
    Informations are usually relatively concise and not too performative. This one is – wow. It’s 38 pages. It has EXHIBITS. I cannot remember ever seeing an Information with exhibits. Any other fedcrim practitioners out there ever see one?
    .
    It’s only two counts – conspiracy to defraud the united states (all the pre-charge stuff he did) and conspiracy to obstruct justice (the post-charge witness tampering). But the descriptions are lavishly detailed.
    .
    Now, it’s not unusual to have the defendant admit to a robust statement of facts. But this level of detail in the information strikes me as unusual. The exhibits are especially a novelty to me.
    .
    I could be wrong of course. But it appears that the information is calculated to make it more politically painful to pardon Manafort – to make a preemptive strike on the “he was unfairly prosecuted for old stuff that was nothing” narrative.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

279 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for esva Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for erik_t Avatar for krux Avatar for tomkremer Avatar for atldrew Avatar for holywah Avatar for c_stedman

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: