NBC News has corrected a story initially claiming that Paul Manafort had the words “donations” and “RNC” in close proximity in his notes from the notorious June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with Kremlin-linked figures. An update added a few hours after the story was first published included a number of sources denying the word “donations” was in the notes, which Manafort turned over as part of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees’ Russia probes.
The vague story, which created a splash when it went up Thursday mid-afternoon, has become more convoluted, with disputes over what exactly was referenced in the notes, if not specifically the word “donation.”
One of the original unnamed NBC News sources is now in the updated version claiming that it was the word “donor,” not the word “donation,” that actually appeared in the document. However, a person who has seen the document told TPM Friday morning that neither the word “donation” nor “donor” appear in the document of Manafort’s notes in the meeting.
When the NBC News story went up Thursday, it was one in a string of developments reflecting the increasing scrutiny on Manafort and the Trump Tower meeting where he, Trump’s son Donald Jr., and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner met with a Russian lawyer and other figures after being promised in an email to Don Jr. damaging information about Hillary Clinton.
The NBC News report immediately prompted speculation about what the words could mean in the context of the meeting, and whether they suggested donations promised by the Russians to the RNC or other possible scenarios where the topic of political contributions could have come up. The original NBC News report described the meaning of the notes as “cryptic” but said, “The contents of the note, which have not been previously disclosed, elevated the significance of the June 2016 meeting for congressional investigators.”
About two hours after the story went up, NBC News updated it to include a statement from Manafort’s spokesman Jason Maloni, that it was “100 percent false to suggest this meeting included any discussion of donations from Russian sources to either the Trump campaign or the Republican Party.”
A spokesman for the Sen. Grassley (R-IA), chair of the Judiciary Committee — which is also investigating Russia’s election interference and whose staff has seen the notes — also pushed back in another version of the story updated a few hours later, telling NBC News that the word “donation” was not in the notes.
That version further muddied the waters with one of the original unnamed sources suggesting the pushback was simply a matter of semantics, clarifying that the word that appeared was “donor,” not donation. Another unnamed source from the original story told NBC News, according to the update, that there was a reference to political contributions, but would not specify the exact word.
From the updated NBC News story:
The NBC News story has a correction at the end of the story, reiterating the various interpretations of what was on the notes.
The NBC News Twitter account also tweeted out the clarification:
New: Sources now say Manafort notes referenced political donations but not explicitly the word “donations.”
— NBC News (@NBCNews) August 31, 2017
When reached by TPM Friday morning, Maloni would not comment on whether “donor” was in the notes. TPM also could not get clarification from the Judiciary Committee spokesman for Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA).
United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 makes a clarification:
“NBC News initially reported that the notes contained the word “donation,” but a spokesman for Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa — the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, whose staff has reviewed the notes — disputed that the word “donation” appears. The two sources who initially provided the information then said that the word was not “donation.” One said it was “donor,” and another said it was a word that referenced political contributions, but that source declined to be more specific.”
Maybe NBC would be wiser not to speculate on the meaning of vague references provided by these two particular sources. Just saying.
What’s to be said? The thot plickens.
Anybody else remember that in All the President’s men there was a story published that turned out not to be true and the Forces of Evil made all kinds of stink about it?
Trump pounced on CNN when they screwed up. But NBC is still writing checks to “Executive Producer” Donald, so the Staff of Lice has no comment on this so far.
Actually, it was “donuts” - Paul needed to bring them up to Trump after the meeting Donald Sr. was listening in on.