Court: Kobach Voter Fraud Panel Must Turn Over Records To Dem Commissioner

Newly-elected Secretary of State Matt Dunlap is stands after the results were announced Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012  during a joint convention to elect constitutional officers in Augusta, Maine. (AP Photo/Joel Page)
Newly-elected Secretary of State Matt Dunlap is stands after the results were announced Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012 during a joint convention to elect constitutional officers in Augusta, Maine. (AP Photo/Joel Page)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal judge Friday sided with a Democrat on President Trump’s voter fraud commission in his request that the commission turn over documents it had been withholding from release.

U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued a preliminary decision backing the Democrat, Maine Secretary of State Matt Dunlap in his claim that he was entitled to view internal communications and other records that the commission has resisted releasing publicly.

The judge stop short of granting some of Dunlap’s other requests, including blocking the commission from releasing a final report if Dunlap was not treated as an equal participant, as she said such is a decision is “premature.”

Friday’s order was the result of a lawsuit brought by Dunlap last month, after previously complaining to the media and directly to the commission’s staff that he was being shut out of its inner workings.

The commission, named the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, was created by Trump in May, after he claimed repeatedly without evidence that millions voted illegally in 2016. It is chaired by Vice President Pence, and vice-chaired by Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R), who is known for pushing restrictive voting laws.

Among the records Dunlap was seeking were internal communications between Kobach and two other Republican commissioners before they were officially named members. These and other records were referenced in a seperate lawsuit alleging that the commission was not being sufficiently transparent.

“The Court shall not monitor every document to be released to Plaintiff, but expects Defendants to comply with the guidance set forth in this decision,” Kollar-Kotelly said Friday. “The Commission has a clear duty to provide Plaintiff with these documents and any similar documents that exist now or in the future.”

Additionally, Kollar-Kotelly slapped down the idea floated by the commission to allow Dunlap view some of the documents in question, but not take notes or make copies of them.

This is not a reasonable offer. If Defendants have decided that Plaintiff should be permitted to review documents, then he should be permitted to take notes and to make copies if he thinks that doing so would be useful,” she said.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Kobach has what he wanted: voter lists from every state he could get to comply with his request. It’s all about building up the data base of his private, for-profit voter list scrubbing operation. Yes, he in fact runs such a business. It’s already scrubbed a number of state lists.

  2. Avatar for acadia acadia says:

    Go Matt! This guy is the definition of an honest broker. When Maine passed ranked choice voting, he was the one who challenged it. He argued because it violated the state constitution (went to court and it did). He challenged it even though he is a Democrat and ranked choice will in general favor Democrats here.

    He is a stickler for the law and due process. He took a lot of heat for agreeing to be on the voter fraud panel, but argued it was important to have Democrats involved to ensure integrity. He won’t quit when it comes to getting to the bottom of all the bullshit going on – I suspect they will try to boot him off as he reveals all the dirty dealing of Kobach, Pence, and their cronies.

  3. Avatar for acadia acadia says:

    Did any comply? I thought least 45 states (even many controlled by Republicans) refused to hand over the data.

  4. I’m curious. When actually sued, what was Kobach’s rationale to the court for these non-defensible actions?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

44 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system Avatar for acadia Avatar for gulliver Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for asanders91360 Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for cd Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for sanni Avatar for ottnott Avatar for tao Avatar for bboerner Avatar for topchap Avatar for tribalogical Avatar for tena Avatar for chicago11 Avatar for kols Avatar for maricaibo Avatar for tsp Avatar for tiowally Avatar for canyoncountry Avatar for maximus Avatar for gromilini

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: