DOJ Formally Agrees To Language Blocking Citizenship Question On 2020 Census

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Justice Department reached an agreement Tuesday with the groups challenging the census citizenship question in New York on language permanently blocking the question from being added to the 2020 census.

The proposed order said that the government is “permanently” blocked not just from including the question on the survey forms, but also from “delaying the process of printing the 2020 decennial census questionnaire after June 30, 2019 for the purpose of including a citizenship question” and otherwise “asking a citizenship question as part of the 2020 decennial census.”

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman signed the order later Tuesday.

President Trump announced from the Rose Garden last week that he was backing down from his efforts to get the question included. Tuesday’s proposed order would give an additional layer of finality to the legal fight over the census change, particularly after Trump had earlier this month reversed the government’s initial representations that it was going forward with the 2020 census without adding the question.

The proceeding in the New York census case — a consolidation of lawsuits from private groups and from New York and other states  — is not yet over. The private groups, which are represented by the ACLU, are expected to say by Tuesday whether or not they are pursuing sanctions against certain witnesses they previously accused of lying in their testimony.

That filing was due on Friday but the parties asked for an extension, given Thursday’s announcements by Trump and an executive order regarding the citizenship data he signed later that night.

Update: This story has been updated to reflect the judge’s signing of the order.

Read the proposed order below:

Latest Muckraker
22
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “The private groups, which are represented by the ACLU, are expected to say by Tuesday whether or not they are pursuing sanctions against certain witnesses they previously accused of lying in their testimony.”

    Will that include the lying President?
    Oh, wait. He slipped and told the truth, said that the question was intended to facilitate redistricting…

  2. I don’t see anything about the DOJ having to get down and eat some literal dirt but I guess that’s more when one kid kick’s another’s ass than it is at the end of a lawsuit. So, in the scheme of things, abject enough.

  3. Don’t see the President enjoined, just Commerce and the Census Bureau.

    …So he could just use a different agency to run the census, complete with citizenship question…

  4. Avatar for fgs fgs says:

    The only mandatory part of the Census should be the number of humans. All the other survey crap should be optional and separate, so that the count is as accurate and timely as possible.

  5. Hi! To find out what I can do, say @discobot display help.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

16 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for fgs Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for epicurus Avatar for dark_hawk_98 Avatar for joelopines Avatar for careysub Avatar for decay500 Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for erik_t Avatar for becauseofjunk Avatar for eaharrison Avatar for gargoyle

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: