Judge Wants To End Georgia’s Absentee Ballot Rejection For Signature Mismatch

ATLANTA, GA - NOVEMBER 4:  Voters turn out to cast their ballots at polling locations on November 4, 2014 in Atlanta, Georgia.  (Photo by Jessica McGowan/Getty Images)
ATLANTA, GA - NOVEMBER 4: Georgia voter stickers are displayed for voters in the midterm election at Grady High School on November 4, 2014 in Atlanta, Georgia. Georgia Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Michelle Nunn... ATLANTA, GA - NOVEMBER 4: Georgia voter stickers are displayed for voters in the midterm election at Grady High School on November 4, 2014 in Atlanta, Georgia. Georgia Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Michelle Nunn is running in a tight race against Republican U.S. Senate candidate David Perdue. (Photo by Jessica McGowan/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal judge signaled on Wednesday that Georgia election officials would no longer be allowed to reject absentee ballots because they believe the signature on the ballot does not match the voter’s signature on public records. Instead, according to the judge’s proposed order, the ballot would be processed as a provisional ballot, and election officials would be required to give the voter notice of the perceived discrepancy, and give the voter — no later than three days before election day — the opportunity to address it.

Likewise, the judge proposed that that applications for absentee ballots, where the election officials believe the signature does not match their records, no longer be rejected, and instead, that voters be provided with a provisional ballots. Those voters too will be be given the opportunity to rectify the signature discrepancy, according to the judge’s order.

U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May gave the parties in the case until noon Thursday to give her feedback on the proposed order.

“The Court is specifically interested in comments as to whether any of the below language is confusing or will be unworkable for the implementing officials,” she said.

The order came after a hearing she held Tuesday in the case brought by the ACLU against Georgia’s signature match absentee voting practices. The hearing also concerned a separate lawsuit challenging more broadly the rejection protocols for absentee ballots, but Wednesday’s order addressed only the signature mismatch aspect of that case.

The ACLU’s lawsuit and the other lawsuit came after reports that Gwinnett County, Georgia’s second most-populous county, was rejecting absentee ballot and ballot applications at a much higher rate than the rest of the state. Gwinnett County and other county elections offices were named as defendants in the lawsuit, as was Secretary of State Brian Kemp (R), who is also running for governor.

The secretary of state’s office has said that it’s up to local officials how they want to handle rejection protocols for absentee ballot and ballot applications. Gwinnett County, in court filings, said that the 524 absentee ballots that have been rejected as of October 18, nine so far were tossed because of a signature discrepancy. Absentee voting had started only three days prior. The filing said 185 ballot applications had been thrown out due to signature mismatch, out  713 applications rejected in total.

 

Read the order here:

Latest Muckraker
20
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. All Kemp has to do is carry on with the multiple voter suppression tactics he is using until after the election. He did this before, was ordered not to do it, and now he is doing it again. Timing is everything - just has to get past the election.

    His actions, of course, are the real voter fraud that he purports to be stopping. There is voter fraud on a massive scale and it is all being done by elected Republicans.

  2. Avatar for ljb860 ljb860 says:

    Judge, folks will have 3 days to fix… OH wait let’s not notify them for 72 hours… can we say fix is in yet.

  3. Avatar for nycabj nycabj says:

    Sounds like they may use another baseless reason to reject ballots in order to get around the court’s bar on using the signature match test.
    I’m sure they’re looking for loopholes harder then finding the ballots rejected for not matching signatures.

  4. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    This makes sense to me from a fraud point of view as well. If the signature does not match, it’s either the registered voter producing a nonmatching signature, in which case obviously the vote should be counted, or it’s an apparent attempt at ballot fraud – in which case it should be investigated like any other felony. Simply dropping the ballot in the wastebasket is either election tampering or officials closing their eyes to attempted election tampering.

  5. No human being on earth has the same signature every single time.
    It’s not within the realm of possibility.

    The only purpose this system has is to suppress the vote.
    Period.
    Full stop.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

14 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for sandi Avatar for gelfling545 Avatar for 1gg Avatar for learning Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for lastroth Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for birdford Avatar for nycabj Avatar for christiandemocrat Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for dicktater

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: